Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB441

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the use of a court order as an occupational license.

Impact

The enactment of HB 441 is expected to have positive implications for individuals who have received a court order affecting their driving rights. By allowing these individuals to use court orders as temporary restricted licenses, the bill provides a structured means for them to maintain necessary mobility for work, education, or other essential activities. This change can significantly impact people whose livelihood relies on their ability to drive, hence promoting personal responsibility while also upholding judicial decisions.

Summary

House Bill 441 focuses on the use of a court order as an occupational license within the context of Texas law. The bill amends the Transportation Code to allow individuals to utilize a copy of the court order as a restricted license, which facilitates their ability to operate a vehicle while subject to certain legal restrictions. Specifically, this legislation aims to ease the transition for individuals who have undergone judicial processes affecting their driving privileges, thereby promoting rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 441 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as demonstrated by the unanimous voting in favor of the bill in the House, where it passed with a vote of 143 yeas and 0 nays. Supporters of the bill, including various stakeholders and lawmakers, argue that this measure supports individual rights and provides a balanced approach that acknowledges the importance of adhering to court rulings while affording individuals a path to retain their mobility.

Contention

While there seem to be no notable points of contention around HB 441 during its discussions, it is important to recognize that such legislative changes do sometimes stir debates regarding the implications of granting restricted licenses based on court orders. Nonetheless, in this case, the lack of opposition and the smooth passage through legislative processes indicate that there is a strong consensus on the bill's intent and the need for corresponding laws to aid individuals post-court proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.