Texas Senate Bill SB1038

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to a study by the General Land Office regarding the feasibility of creating a mechanism by which a governmental entity could acquire small parcels of real property in an area and convey them to a developer in order to ensure the property is developed in compliance with model subdivision rules.

Impact

The potential impact of SB1038 extends to improving land-use efficiency in Texas, specifically in areas where small parcels hinder development initiatives. Through the proposed mechanisms, this bill could allow governments to efficiently gather and redistribute land to developers who are capable of meeting the growing housing and commercial demands of their communities. By providing a clear framework for acquisition and development standards, the legislation could significantly impact how stakeholders manage and utilize land resources while aligning them with state regulations.

Summary

SB1038 proposes a study by the General Land Office to explore the feasibility of a mechanism that allows governmental entities to acquire small parcels of real property and convey them to developers. The purpose is to promote the development of these properties in compliance with established model subdivision rules. By acquiring contiguous parcels, the bill aims to streamline the process of property development and ensure that developers meet specific growth and planning standards. This legislative effort acknowledges the challenges associated with piecemeal land ownership and seeks to facilitate coordinated development efforts.

Contention

While SB1038 focuses on enabling better land development practices, it may encounter opposition from property owners concerned about governmental encroachment on private land. The bill proposes a state-regulated method for acquisition, which some may view as threatening their property rights. Additionally, developers might express varied opinions regarding the mechanism’s efficacy or structure, especially concerning the arbitration of compensation for landowners. The balance between encouraging development and protecting property rights will likely be a key point of contention amongst stakeholders as the bill progresses.