Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1073

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the requirements for a candidate's application or nomination for a place on the ballot and related procedures.

Impact

The passage of SB1073 is set to impact state election laws significantly, streamlining the nomination procedure for candidates. By consolidating and clarifying requirements, the bill aims to simplify the application process while reinforcing compliance to ensure that all candidates meet the established criteria before appearing on the ballot. This change could lead to improved voter confidence in the integrity of candidates and the electoral process as a whole.

Summary

SB1073 addresses the procedural requirements for candidates seeking a place on the ballot in Texas. The bill revises several provisions of the Election Code, ensuring that candidates' applications contain specific information such as their full name, occupation, the office sought, and required affidavits affirming their eligibility. Among its notable provisions, the bill also establishes requirements for the certification of nominees and details the protocols for addressing incomplete applications due to insufficient fees. These modifications intend to enhance the clarity and integrity of the candidate nomination process.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1073 appears largely positive among legislators favoring election integrity and transparency, with supporters advocating that these measures will create a more reliable and accountable system for candidate nominations. However, there are some concerns regarding the potential challenges candidates may face, particularly those with less access to resources who might struggle with the application requirements and processing fees. Despite this, the overall reception seems supportive as it aligns with broader efforts to maintain fair electoral practices in Texas.

Contention

One point of contention raised during discussions about SB1073 revolves around the implications of requiring more stringent application processes. Critics express fears that this could inadvertently disenfranchise smaller party candidates or independent candidates who may lack the funding to cover filing fees or navigate the updated procedures. The bill attempts to balance clarity and accessibility, but debates continue on whether the additional paperwork and requirements create unnecessary barriers for certain candidates, potentially affecting voter choice in the electoral process.

Companion Bills

TX HB3110

Similar Relating to information regarding candidates provided by a political party to the secretary of state.

Similar Bills

TX HB3110

Relating to information regarding candidates provided by a political party to the secretary of state.

MN SF2386

Funds appropriation for transition expenses for secretary of state-elect, state auditor-elect, and attorney general-elect

MT HB479

Require candidates for office to disclose foreign citizenship

LA SB173

Requires a notice to be posted upon the withdrawal or disqualification of a candidate's name that remains on the ballot. (8/1/20) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

SD SB40

Revise the process for nominating candidates for lieutenant governor and to make related technical changes.

ME LD922

An Act to Clarify Required Disclosure of Personally Identifying Information for Certain Nominating Petitions

TX HB204

Relating to placing the name of a deceased or ineligible candidate for public office on the ballot.

NJ S3211

Prohibits institution of higher education from using cultural competency as criteria for consideration in making certain personnel determinations.