Relating to rules which insure that local independent school district selection of non-state adopted instructional materials to be purchased with state funds, is as accountable and transparent as the State Board of Education approval process for state-adopted instruction materials.
Impact
If passed, SB1711 would require the State Board of Education to set minimum standards for local selection processes regarding non-state adopted instructional materials. This includes components such as public notice, access to materials, and opportunities for community input. By mandating a structured selection process, the bill aims to prevent factual errors in instructional content and increase the integrity of materials used in classrooms. Ultimately, this legislation could lead to improved educational outcomes by ensuring that all instructional materials are vetted appropriately, regardless of whether they are state-adopted or locally selected.
Summary
SB1711 proposes to amend the Education Code to enhance the accountability and transparency of local independent school districts when selecting non-state adopted instructional materials funded by the state. The bill aims to establish rules that ensure these selections are as rigorous and transparent as those made by the State Board of Education for state-adopted materials. This move is intended to create a more uniform process across different school districts, ensuring that instructional materials meet established educational standards.
Contention
There may be points of contention surrounding SB1711, particularly regarding local autonomy in educational decision-making. Advocates for local control may argue that this bill could impose unnecessary state oversight on independent school districts, limiting their ability to select materials that best fit their unique educational contexts. Conversely, supporters of the bill might contend that ensuring accountability and transparency in material selection is essential for maintaining high educational standards across the state. This debate highlights the tension between standardized requirements and the need for localized flexibility in educational practices.
Very Similar
Relating to rules which insure that local independent school district selection of non-state adopted instructional materials to be purchased with state funds, is as accountable and transparent as the State Board of Education approval process for state-adopted instructional materials.
Relating to instructional material and technology, the adoption of essential knowledge and skills for certain public school foundation curriculum subjects, and the extension of additional state aid to school districts for the provision of certain instructional materials; authorizing a fee.
Relating to the acceptable uses of the instructional materials and technology fund and the review of certain instructional materials by the State Board of Education.
Relating to instructional material and technology, the adoption of essential knowledge and skills for certain public school foundation curriculum subjects, and creating allotments for the procurement of certain instructional materials under the Foundation School Program; authorizing a fee.
Relating to the approval of purchases under the supplemental special education services and instructional materials program by a public school student's admission, review, and dismissal committee.
Relating to public education, including parental rights and public school responsibilities regarding instructional materials and the establishment of an education savings account program.