Texas Senate Bill SB398

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to fingerprints collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety from an applicant for a driver's license or personal identification certificate and used for the department's image verification system.

Impact

The implementation of SB398 is expected to streamline identification processes within the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). By integrating an image verification system that employs biometric data, the bill intends to enhance the accuracy and reliability of identity verification. The bill proposes to amend existing laws in the Transportation Code, specifically Section 521.059, thereby formalizing the collection of biometric data for officials' access in identity management.

Summary

SB398 aims to enhance the driver's license and personal identification certificate application process in Texas by establishing an image verification system. This system is built upon the collection of facial images and fingerprints from applicants, specifically utilizing thumbprints or, when unavailable, index fingerprints. This legislative measure is poised to modernize identity verification and bolster security by ensuring that the department has reliable identifiers for individuals applying for state identification.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB398 appears to be generally positive among stakeholders who prioritize improved identity verification methods. Supporters argue that the bill represents a critical step forward in public safety, enhancing the assurance that identification documents are obtained legitimately through the use of advanced technologies. However, some concerns may arise regarding privacy implications, as the collection of biometric data, such as fingerprints, raises questions about data security and personal privacy.

Contention

While the bill prompts significant advances in identification processes, opposition may emerge surrounding issues of privacy and potential misuse of biometric data. Critics might argue that such regulations could lead to excessive governmental surveillance and tracking of citizens. Hence, debates may revolve around appropriate safeguarding measures for the collected data and delineating the boundaries for how this information is utilized by the DPS.