Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB6 Introduced / Analysis

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS        Senate Research Center   S.B. 6     84R4289 MEW-F   By: Taylor, Larry; Campbell         Education         3/9/2015         As Filed    

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

Senate Research Center S.B. 6
84R4289 MEW-F By: Taylor, Larry; Campbell
 Education
 3/9/2015
 As Filed

Senate Research Center

S.B. 6

84R4289 MEW-F

By: Taylor, Larry; Campbell

 

Education

 

3/9/2015

 

As Filed

       AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT   Currently, the states public schools are labeled either met standard or improvement required (the equivalent of a pass-fail rating).  Beginning in 2016, individual campuses will be labeled using four different category rankings of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, and unacceptable. These four designations lack the clarity of an A-F rating system. S.B. 6 provides Texas parents with a more transparent way to determine the quality of their local schools in order to make the best decision for their child.     Key Points:       Last session the legislature voted to rate districts on an A-F rating in H.B. 5.  Although the bill also included an A-F rating for campuses as passed on the floor of the House and Senate, the campus rating was removed during the Conference Committee.        S.B. 6 changes the campus rating label used by the state to an A-F rating, making campus ratings more transparent for parents and communities.        S.B. 6 accelerates implementation of A-F district ratings to the upcoming 2015-2016 school year (vs. current law implementation in the 2016-2017 school year).    Over the last decade, 16 states have adopted A-F ratings for campuses. In the first few years of implementation in Florida, D and F campuses outnumbered A and B campuses. By 2013, 59 percent of campuses in Florida had earned an A or B.   As proposed, S.B. 6 amends current law relating to public school performance ratings.   RULEMAKING AUTHORITY   Rulemaking authority previously granted to the commissioner of education is modified in SECTION 1 (Section 39.054, Education Code) of this bill.   SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS   SECTION 1. Amends Section 39.054, Education Code, by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1), as follows:   (a) Requires the commissioner of education (commissioner) to adopt rules to evaluate school district and campus performance and assign each district and campus a performance rating of A, B, C, D, or F. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of A reflects exemplary performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of B reflects recognized performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of C, rather than B or C, reflects acceptable performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of D or F reflects unacceptable performance. Provides that a district may not receive a performance rating of A if the district includes any campus with a performance rating of D or F, rather than a performance rating of unacceptable. Provides that a reference in law to an acceptable rating or acceptable performance includes a performance rating of A or B or exemplary or recognized performance.   Deletes existing text requiring the commissioner to also assign each campus a performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable, and deletes existing text providing that a campus performance rating of exemplary, recognized, or acceptable reflects acceptable performance, and a campus performance rating of unacceptable reflects unacceptable performance. Makes nonsubstantive changes.   (a-1) Creates this subsection from existing text. Requires that the performance rating of each district and campus, not later than August 8 of each year, be made publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this section, rather than subsection. Requires the commissioner, if a district or campus received a performance rating of D or F, rather than if a district or campus received a performance rating that reflected unacceptable performance, for the preceding school year, to notify the district of a subsequent such designation on or before June 15.   SECTION 2. Repealer: Section 44(b) (providing that this section applies beginning with the 2014-2015 school year), Chapter 211 (H.B. 5), Acts of the 83rd Legislature, Regular Session, 2013.   SECTION 3. Provides that this Act applies beginning with the 2015-2016 school year.   SECTION 4. Effective date: upon passage or September 1, 2015. 

 

 

 

AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

 

Currently, the states public schools are labeled either met standard or improvement required (the equivalent of a pass-fail rating).  Beginning in 2016, individual campuses will be labeled using four different category rankings of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, and unacceptable. These four designations lack the clarity of an A-F rating system. S.B. 6 provides Texas parents with a more transparent way to determine the quality of their local schools in order to make the best decision for their child.  

 

Key Points:

 

    Last session the legislature voted to rate districts on an A-F rating in H.B. 5.  Although the bill also included an A-F rating for campuses as passed on the floor of the House and Senate, the campus rating was removed during the Conference Committee. 

 

    S.B. 6 changes the campus rating label used by the state to an A-F rating, making campus ratings more transparent for parents and communities. 

 

    S.B. 6 accelerates implementation of A-F district ratings to the upcoming 2015-2016 school year (vs. current law implementation in the 2016-2017 school year). 

 

Over the last decade, 16 states have adopted A-F ratings for campuses. In the first few years of implementation in Florida, D and F campuses outnumbered A and B campuses. By 2013, 59 percent of campuses in Florida had earned an A or B.

 

As proposed, S.B. 6 amends current law relating to public school performance ratings.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

Rulemaking authority previously granted to the commissioner of education is modified in SECTION 1 (Section 39.054, Education Code) of this bill.

 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1. Amends Section 39.054, Education Code, by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1), as follows:

 

(a) Requires the commissioner of education (commissioner) to adopt rules to evaluate school district and campus performance and assign each district and campus a performance rating of A, B, C, D, or F. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of A reflects exemplary performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of B reflects recognized performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of C, rather than B or C, reflects acceptable performance. Provides that a district or campus performance rating of D or F reflects unacceptable performance. Provides that a district may not receive a performance rating of A if the district includes any campus with a performance rating of D or F, rather than a performance rating of unacceptable. Provides that a reference in law to an acceptable rating or acceptable performance includes a performance rating of A or B or exemplary or recognized performance.

 

Deletes existing text requiring the commissioner to also assign each campus a performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable, and deletes existing text providing that a campus performance rating of exemplary, recognized, or acceptable reflects acceptable performance, and a campus performance rating of unacceptable reflects unacceptable performance. Makes nonsubstantive changes.

 

(a-1) Creates this subsection from existing text. Requires that the performance rating of each district and campus, not later than August 8 of each year, be made publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this section, rather than subsection. Requires the commissioner, if a district or campus received a performance rating of D or F, rather than if a district or campus received a performance rating that reflected unacceptable performance, for the preceding school year, to notify the district of a subsequent such designation on or before June 15.

 

SECTION 2. Repealer: Section 44(b) (providing that this section applies beginning with the 2014-2015 school year), Chapter 211 (H.B. 5), Acts of the 83rd Legislature, Regular Session, 2013.

 

SECTION 3. Provides that this Act applies beginning with the 2015-2016 school year.

 

SECTION 4. Effective date: upon passage or September 1, 2015.