Texas Senate Bill SCR14

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Granting the legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during the period beginning on Wednesday, February 18, 2015, and ending on Monday, February 23, 2015.

Impact

The passing of SCR14 was essential for providing legislative flexibility, allowing both chambers to manage their schedules effectively without the constraint of a strict three-day limit. This resolution facilitates better planning and execution of legislative business, ensuring that lawmakers could take the time they needed for deliberation and committee work. The resolution was adopted unanimously in both the Senate and the House, indicating broad bipartisan support for the measure, and exemplifying cooperation between the two legislative bodies.

Summary

SCR14 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution from the 84th Legislature of Texas, primarily designed to grant both the House and Senate permission to adjourn for more than three days during a specified period in February 2015. The specific period mentioned in the resolution begins on February 18, 2015, and concludes on February 23, 2015, which reflects typical legislative scheduling needs where longer breaks may be necessary. This resolution is consistent with the provisions set forth in Section 17, Article III of the Texas Constitution, which restricts either house from adjournment exceeding three days without mutual consent.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR14 was overwhelmingly positive, with both houses demonstrating agreement through a unanimous vote—30 in favor in the Senate and 141 in favor in the House. The lack of opposition suggests that the resolution was seen as a practical step that would not only streamline legislative operations but also respond to the needs of the lawmakers during that particular session. This cooperative spirit between the chambers reflects an underlying respect for the legislative process and its procedural necessities.

Contention

While there are generally no notable points of contention regarding SCR14 given its unanimous passage, the underlying principle of the resolution does highlight an important procedural aspect of legislative sessions. This resolution exemplifies how legislative bodies can smoothly navigate their operational requirements while adhering to constitutional constraints. Nevertheless, discussions around such resolutions could always highlight the balance between maintaining orderly legislative processes and the necessity for flexibility to accommodate unforeseen circumstances that may arise during a session.