Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to nullify an order, rule, policy, or similar measure adopted by the executive branch of the federal government that exceeds the authority granted by the United States Constitution.
Impact
The proposed amendment aims to provide a mechanism for the Texas legislature to respond to what supporters argue is federal overreach into state affairs. By enabling the legislature to act unilaterally, SJR59 could significantly alter the dynamics of state-federal relations, especially in contentious areas like health care, immigration, and environmental regulations. Proponents believe this could protect Texas from policies they view as unconstitutional or detrimental to the state’s interests.
Summary
SJR59 proposes a constitutional amendment that would empower the Texas legislature to nullify any federal executive order, agency rule, or similar measure that it deems to exceed the authority granted to the executive branch by the United States Constitution. This legislative action would not require the approval of the governor, which marks a significant shift in the balance of power between state and federal governments. If approved, this amendment would allow the state to reject certain federal mandates, thereby asserting its autonomy and self-governance.
Contention
The main points of contention surrounding SJR59 hinge on the implications of allowing a state legislature to nullify federal executive actions. Supporters argue that it safeguards states' rights against federal overreach, while opponents raise concerns about the potential for legislative abuse and the undermining of federal authority. Critics fear this could lead to a fragmented legal landscape and increased tensions between state and federal governments, as well as inconsistent application of laws that might confuse or harm constituents.
Additional_points
If enacted, SJR59 would amend Article III of the Texas Constitution, adding a new section that formalizes this legislative power. This could set a precedent for other states, potentially leading to a wave of similar measures nationwide as states seek to assert their authority against perceived overreaches by the federal government. It is crucial to consider the long-term implications of such power consolidation in a single branch of the state government.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch to 12 consecutive years.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for exceptions to the requirement that a home equity loan be closed only at the office of the lender, an attorney at law, or a title company.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing local option elections to legalize or prohibit the operation of eight-liners or similar gaming devices; authorizing a fee.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation property used to control pollution, regardless of whether the property is used to meet or exceed rules or regulations adopted for that purpose.