Texas House Bill HB2093

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to a study and report by the commissioner of education concerning consideration of the performance of gifted and talented students under the public school accountability system.

Impact

The legislation seeks to address concerns regarding the current public school accountability system, which may not adequately account for the unique needs and performances of gifted students. By formalizing a method of evaluation for this student demographic, the bill emphasizes the importance of differentiated education approaches that uphold the performance levels of gifted learners. This could lead to amendments in existing policies to ensure that gifted students receive appropriate recognition and support within the education system.

Summary

House Bill 2093 aims to enhance the public school accountability system in Texas by including a study that evaluates how the performance of gifted and talented students is considered when assessing school districts and campuses. The bill mandates that the commissioner of education conducts this study and subsequently submits a report detailing recommended methods for incorporating the performance of these students into the accountability framework. This initiative reflects an effort to ensure that all dimensions of student achievement, particularly for those identified as gifted, are factored into educational assessments.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2093 has been positive, particularly among educators and advocates for gifted education. Proponents argue that by recognizing and formalizing the assessment of gifted students, the bill will lead to the development of more tailored educational strategies that benefit high-achieving students. Critics, while potentially acknowledging the benefits, may highlight the challenges of implementation and the need for additional resources to carry out the recommendations from the commissioner’s report effectively.

Contention

Despite its positive reception, the bill does raise some points of contention, especially regarding the available resources and the feasibility of implementing the recommendations that may arise from the commissioner’s study. There may be concerns about how schools will manage the additional evaluations and whether such measures could unintentionally detract from broader educational goals. Furthermore, the expiration clause included in the bill, which states the new provisions will expire by December 31, 2018, if not renewed or expanded, highlights the temporary nature of its potential impact on the education system.