Texas House Bill HB2644

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to prohibiting the use of money in the Texas economic development fund or the Texas Enterprise Fund to finance a facility or establishment at which gambling is to be conducted.

Impact

Should HB2644 be enacted, it would directly amend the Agriculture Code and the Government Code to restrict state-funded financial support for gambling-related establishments. This change could limit the potential growth of gambling businesses within Texas while affecting various sectors that might have sought state assistance for development. Particularly, it places a significant barrier on any initiatives that might involve the expansion of gambling services or facilities that could be developed with public money, thereby influencing the economic landscape of Texas.

Summary

House Bill 2644 seeks to prohibit the use of funds from the Texas economic development fund and the Texas Enterprise Fund to finance any facility or establishment associated with gambling activities, including bingo and wagering on greyhound or horse racing. The underlying intent of this legislation is to ensure that state funds do not support industries associated with gambling, which has been a contentious issue in Texas legislative discussions. The bill reflects a clear stance against state-sponsored gambling activities and signals the state's position on such establishments.

Contention

Notably, the bill does present points of contention among legislators. Proponents argue that it safeguards public funds from being misused to promote activities they consider morally inappropriate, while opponents may argue that this discourages economic development opportunities in industries that are regulated and can contribute positively to the state's economy. The debate surrounding such measures often involves broader discussions about the role of gambling in economic policy and the ethical implications of government funding.

Additional_clarity

The provisions outlined in the bill indicate that any grants awarded prior to its effective date are not impacted, showing a transitional approach that respects existing agreements while setting a clear directive for future funding decisions. The bill's enactment would reinforce a prohibition that aligns with the sentiments of constituents who are opposed to state involvement in gambling financing.