Texas House Bill HB2974

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to certain sexual offenses; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty.

Impact

By expanding the definitions and penalties of sexual offenses, HB 2974 alters the Penal Code, particularly Chapter 21, to specifically include provisions related to the coercion of sexual conduct and materials. The implications of this bill could help address the emerging challenges posed by digital platforms where such coercions might take place, intending to safeguard potential victims and impose stiffer penalties on offenders. The measure aims to deter individuals from using coercive tactics to exploit others for personal gains related to intimate materials.

Summary

House Bill 2974 addresses certain sexual offenses by creating a new criminal offense termed 'sexual coercion.' The bill specifically enhances the legal framework concerning the intimidation and threats made to obtain intimate visual material or sexual conduct, penalizing such actions with state jail felony classification. The bill intends to provide broader protections against sexual harassment and coercive actions that often occur through digital means, utilizing technology to perpetuate these offenses.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2974 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for victims' rights. Many stakeholders in the legislative process, including members of women’s advocacy groups, have praised the effort to modernize laws to reflect contemporary issues surrounding digital sexual coercion. However, there may also be concerns about the clarity in the application of these laws and whether they might lead to unintended consequences in criminal prosecutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding how broadly the term 'sexual coercion' is defined and enforced. Critics may argue that such broad definitions could potentially lead to overreach in the prosecution of individuals, particularly concerning the nuances of consent and consensual exchanges that could be mischaracterized as coercive. Additionally, there may be discussions about the implications of technological threats and whether existing protections were previously adequate or need further strengthening.