Relating to certain reporting requirements for law enforcement agencies and to the creation of a criminal justice web portal by the office of the attorney general.
Impact
If passed, HB 673 would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Government Code of Texas, requiring the attorney general to compile and maintain data that reflects the occurrences of officer-involved incidents. This legal framework aims to ensure that the annual reports from law enforcement agencies are standardized and accessible, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive understanding of law enforcement interactions and outcomes in Texas. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for an interactive web portal that would allow public access to the reports, thus reinforcing a culture of transparency in criminal justice practices.
Summary
House Bill 673 seeks to enhance reporting requirements for law enforcement agencies in Texas and establish a central web portal for criminal justice data managed by the Office of the Attorney General. The bill mandates that law enforcement agencies report officer-involved injuries and deaths annually to provide better oversight and data collection for criminal justice incidents. By improving data transparency, the bill aims to promote accountability among law enforcement agencies and provide lawmakers and the public with essential information regarding incidents involving police officers.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 673 is largely supportive, especially among advocacy groups focused on police accountability and transparency in law enforcement. Proponents of the bill argue that better data collection and public access will help to address issues of police misconduct and improve community relations. However, there may be concerns from law enforcement agencies regarding the additional workload and potential implications for agency operations. Overall, the bill garners backing for its focus on improving accountability within the criminal justice system.
Contention
While HB 673 aims to enhance transparency within law enforcement, there remains some contention regarding the implementation and operational impact on law enforcement agencies. Some critics argue that the requirements can place an excessive burden on local agencies, particularly in resource-strapped areas. The balance between accountability and operational efficiency will be critical as discussions around the bill proceed, and any pushback from law enforcement groups could reshape how the bill is ultimately structured or enforced.
Relating to official oppression and to law enforcement policies requiring peace officers to report certain peace officer misconduct; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the release of defendants on bail, the duties of a magistrate in certain criminal proceedings, and the appointment of certain criminal law hearing officers; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the enforcement of certain election laws by district attorneys, criminal district attorneys, and county attorneys; providing a civil penalty.
Relating to the carrying of weapons by community supervision and corrections department officers, juvenile probation officers, and certain retired law enforcement officers and to criminal liability for taking a weapon from certain of those officers.
Relating to the carrying of weapons by community supervision and corrections department officers, juvenile probation officers, and certain retired law enforcement officers and to criminal liability for taking a weapon from certain of those officers.