Texas House Bill HJR100

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment on professional sports team charitable foundations conducting charitable raffles.

Impact

If approved, HJR100 would formalize and expand the current legal framework surrounding charitable raffles conducted by professional sports teams in Texas. This amendment is intended to enhance the fundraising capabilities of these organizations while ensuring that they operate under a state-regulated framework. The potential increase in revenue generated through these raffles could significantly benefit local charities, creating a stronger community engagement aspect tied to sports events.

Summary

HJR100 is a proposed constitutional amendment in Texas that aims to modify Section 47 of Article III to allow charitable foundations associated with professional sports teams to conduct charitable raffles. The bill proposes that the Texas Legislature enact general law permitting these foundations to run raffles according to specified regulations. These regulations would permit the use of raffle proceeds to cover reasonable advertising, promotional, and administrative expenses. However, such raffles would only be allowed at the home venues of the respective sports teams, aligning closely with existing operational norms in the fundraising landscape for professional sports.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HJR100 appears to be supportive among stakeholders who recognize the positive implications for charitable organizations and community fundraising. Proponents argue that this bill represents a valuable opportunity for professional sports teams to further engage with their audiences while supporting local charitable initiatives. Conversely, there might be concerns raised by those who fear regulatory burdens or oversight issues may emerge from the execution of this amendment, potentially complicating activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics of how these raffles will be regulated under the proposed legislation and the broader implications for existing state laws governing charitable fundraising. Opponents may argue that the amendment could lead to a dilution of standards or misuse within the framework of charitable activities. The bill must navigate the concerns of transparency and accountability in fundraising, ensuring that the newly permitted activities serve the intended purpose of benefiting local charities without fostering potential exploitation.