Texas House Bill HJR48

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 12/27/16

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to phase out by 2027 the ad valorem taxation by a school district of the tangible personal property a person owns that consists of inventory.

Note

Overall, HJR48 is positioned as a proactive measure to respond to economic pressures faced by local businesses, with an eye toward future growth and sustainability in the Texas economy. The approach to phase out the tax reflects an understanding of the challenges businesses encounter and a commitment to fostering an environment conducive to their success.

Impact

The implementation of HJR48 would have direct implications on state revenue and local school district finances, as property tax generated from inventory represents a significant source of funding for public education. While the bill outlines a gradual exemption schedule, critics might point out that reducing tax revenue could threaten the viability of school funding, thereby affecting educational programs and resources. Proponents argue that the bill would stimulate economic growth and job creation by allowing businesses to retain more capital, which they could reinvest into their operations.

Summary

HJR48 proposes a constitutional amendment that would allow the Texas legislature to phase out, by the year 2027, the ad valorem taxation of tangible personal property, specifically inventory, owned by individuals. This legislative change aims to alleviate the tax burden on businesses that own inventory, thus potentially fostering a more favorable business environment in the state. The amendment is designed to provide significant tax relief by exempting a progressively increasing percentage of inventory from taxation over a series of years leading up to 2027, at which point full exemption would be expected to take effect.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding HJR48 may involve the balance between ensuring adequate funding for public schools and providing tax relief to businesses. Opponents might argue that the reduction in tax revenue could lead to cuts in education funding, which could, in turn, negatively impact students and teachers within the school system. Conversely, supporters would likely argue that a robust business environment ultimately benefits the community as a whole through increased employment opportunities and economic vitality.