Texas Senate Bill SB1046

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to sources of funding for the Texas emissions reduction plan.

Impact

If approved, SB 1046 would directly affect the financial structures that support the emissions reduction initiatives in Texas. By stipulating specific collection and allocation pathways for fees, this legislation seeks to establish a more robust funding stream, aimed at improving air quality across the state. The changes outlined could potentially enable the state to meet federal air quality standards more effectively, fostering public health and ecological benefits by reducing harmful emissions from various sources.

Summary

Senate Bill 1046 aims to modify the sources of funding for the Texas emissions reduction plan. The bill amends existing sections of the Tax Code and Transportation Code to define how fees collected from specified activities will be allocated to this plan. The framework for funding relies heavily on the oversight of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which is tasked with determining whether designated areas meet national air quality standards for ozone set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Should these areas achieve 'attainment' status, the funding mechanisms established in the bill would come into effect.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1046 appears to be cautiously optimistic, especially among environmental advocacy groups and public health supporters who see the necessity of funding for emissions reduction initiatives. However, there may be concern among certain stakeholders regarding the increased regulation of emissions and potential financial implications for businesses. The overall sentiment seems to reflect a balance between the need for improved air quality and skepticism about regulatory ramifications for affected industries.

Contention

Debate on SB 1046 may center on the balance between state regulatory involvement in emissions funding and the economic implications for businesses subject to increased fees. Some critics might argue that augmenting fees could hinder business operations, while proponents would counter that the long-term environmental benefits justify the costs. Key issues include the effectiveness of the emissions reduction plan and how the funding mechanisms might impact both compliance requirements for businesses and state efforts to achieve federal air quality targets.