Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1447 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 03/08/2017

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            By: Estes S.B. No. 1447


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the liability of a sport shooting range.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  The heading to Subchapter B, Chapter 128, Civil
 Practice and Remedies Code, is amended to read as follows:
 SUBCHAPTER B. CIVIL ACTIONS BY PRIVATE PERSONS
 SECTION 2.  Sections 128.051(3) and (4), Civil Practice and
 Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (3)  "Expert" means a person who is:
 (A)  giving opinion testimony about the
 appropriate standard of care for a sport shooting range, an owner or
 operator of a sport shooting range, or the owner of real property on
 which a sport shooting range is operated, or the causal
 relationship between the injury, harm, or damages claimed and the
 alleged departure from the applicable standard of care; and
 (B)  qualified pursuant to Sections 128.054 or
 128.055 to render opinions on the standards or [and] causal
 relationship described by Paragraph (A) under the Texas Rules of
 Evidence.
 (4)  "Expert report" means a written report by an
 expert meeting the requirements of Section 128.054 that provides a
 fair summary of the expert's opinions as of the date of the report
 regarding applicable standards of care for operation of a sport
 shooting range[,] and the manner in which a defendant failed to meet
 the standards, or by an expert meeting the requirements of Section
 128.055 that provides a fair summary of the expert's opinions as of
 the date of the report regarding [and] the causal relationship
 between that failure and the injury, harm, or damages claimed.
 SECTION 3.  Sections 128.052(b) and (c), Civil Practice and
 Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (b)  Nothing in this section prohibits a civil action against
 a sport shooting range, the owner or operator of a sport shooting
 range, or the owner of the real property on which a sport shooting
 range is operated for recovery of damages for:
 (1)  breach of contract for use of the real property on
 which a sport shooting range is located;
 (2)  damage or harm to private property caused by the
 discharge of firearms on a sport shooting range; or
 (3)  personal injury or death caused by the discharge
 of a firearm on a sport shooting range[; or
 [(4) injunctive relief to enforce a valid ordinance,
 statute, or regulation].
 (c)  Damages may be awarded[, or an injunction may be
 obtained,] in a civil action brought under [this section]
 Subsection (b) only if the claimant shows by a preponderance of the
 evidence, through the testimony of one or more experts meeting the
 requirements of Section 128.054 [witnesses], that the sport
 shooting range, the owner or operator of the sport shooting range,
 or the owner of real property on which the sport shooting range is
 operated deviated from the standard of care that is reasonably
 expected of an ordinarily prudent sport shooting range, owner or
 operator of a sport shooting range, or owner of real property on
 which a sport shooting range is operated in the same or similar
 circumstances and by the testimony of one or more expert witnesses
 meeting the requirements of Section 128.055 that the alleged
 deviation from the appropriate standard of care was the cause of the
 damages asserted. This subsection does not create a cause of
 action.
 SECTION 4.  Sections 128.053(a), (d), and (e), Civil
 Practice and Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a)  In a suit against a sport shooting range, an owner or
 operator of a sport shooting range, or the owner of real property on
 which a sport shooting range is operated, a claimant shall, not
 later than the 90th day after the date the original petition was
 filed, serve on each party or the party's attorney one or more
 expert reports authored by one or more experts meeting the
 requirements of Sections 128.054 and 128.055, with a curriculum
 vitae of each expert listed in the report for each defendant against
 whom a claim is asserted. The date for serving the report may be
 extended by written agreement of the affected parties. Each
 defendant whose conduct is implicated in a report must file and
 serve any objection to the sufficiency of the report not later than
 the 21st day after the date the report and curriculum vitae are [is]
 served or all objections are waived.
 (d)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a
 claimant may satisfy any requirement of this section for serving an
 expert report by serving reports of separate experts meeting the
 requirements of Sections 128.054 or 128.055 regarding different
 defendants or regarding different issues arising from the conduct
 of a defendant, including issues of liability and causation.
 Nothing in this section shall be construed to mean that a single
 expert must address all liability and causation issues with respect
 to all defendants or with respect to both liability and causation
 issues for a defendant.
 (e)  A court shall grant a motion challenging the adequacy of
 an expert report only if it appears to the court, after a hearing,
 that the report does not represent an objective, good faith effort
 to comply with the requirements of an expert report. A court shall
 find that an expert report served in compliance with Subsection (a)
 does not represent an objective, good faith effort to comply with
 the requirements of an expert report if:
 (1)  the expert's curriculum vitae indicates the expert
 does not meet the requirements of Section 128.054 to offer opinions
 on the appropriate standard of care for a sport shooting range or
 that the expert does not meet the requirements of Section 128.055 to
 offer opinions concerning a causal link between the alleged
 deviation from the appropriate standard of care and the damages
 claimed; or
 (2)  the expert report fails to address either the
 standard of care for a sport shooting range, the alleged breach of
 the standard of care, or a causal link between the alleged breach
 and the claimant's damages.
 SECTION 5.  Subchapter B, Chapter 128, Civil Practice and
 Remedies Code, is amended by adding Sections 128.054 and 128.055 to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 128.054.  QUALIFICATIONS OF EXPERT WITNESS ON THE
 STANDARD OF CARE. (a) In a suit involving a claim subject to the
 requirements of Section 128.053, a person may qualify as an expert
 witness on the issue of whether the sport shooting range, the owner
 or operator of a sport shooting range, or the owner of real property
 on which a sport shooting range is operated departed from the
 accepted standard of care only if the person:
 (1)  is operating a sport shooting range as defined by
 Section 250.001, Local Government Code, at the time such testimony
 is given, or was operating a sport shooting range as defined by
 Section 250.001, Local Government Code, at the time the claim
 arose;
 (2)  has knowledge of the accepted standards of care
 for a sport shooting range of the type involved in the claim; and
 (3)  is qualified on the basis of training or
 experience to offer an expert opinion regarding those accepted
 standards of care.
 (b)  As used in this section, "operating a sport shooting
 range" includes responsibility for, or actual participation,
 either directly or in a supervisory capacity, in the maintenance
 and repair of the facility, the supervision of persons shooting on
 the range, the identification and correction of any safety hazards,
 and the establishment of rules of conduct and safety procedures for
 persons using the facility.
 (c)  In determining whether a person has sufficient training
 or experience to qualify as an expert under this section, the court
 shall consider whether, at the time the claim arose or at the time
 the testimony is given, the witness meets the qualification
 requirements of Subsections (a) and (b) by demonstrating experience
 with a sport shooting range that is substantially similar to the
 range against which the claim is asserted with regard to the range's
 size, the range's location, the population density surrounding the
 range, and the types of firearms used on the range.
 (d)  This section does not prevent an operator of a sport
 shooting range who is a defendant from qualifying as an expert.
 Sec. 128.055.  QUALIFICATIONS OF EXPERT WITNESS ON
 CAUSATION. (a) In a suit involving a claim subject to the
 requirements of Section 128.053, a person may qualify as an expert
 witness on the issue of the causal relationship between the alleged
 departure from the standard of care and the injury, harm, or damages
 claimed only if the person:
 (1)  is qualified to render opinions on that causal
 relationship under the Texas Rules of Evidence; and
 (2)  if the claim is based in whole or in part on an
 allegation that injury, harm, or damages were caused by one or more
 bullets or other projectiles, demonstrates that the person
 possesses education, training, and experience in the science of
 ballistics dealing with the flight, behavior, and effects of
 bullets and other projectiles launched from a firearm.
 (b)  In a jury trial, the court shall determine an expert's
 competence to testify about ballistics under Subsection (a)(2)
 outside the presence of the jury.
 SECTION 6.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
 to a cause of action that accrues on or after the effective date of
 this Act. A cause of action that accrues before the effective date
 of this Act is governed by the law in effect immediately before the
 effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for
 that purpose.
 SECTION 7.  This Act takes effect on September 1, 2017.