Texas Senate Bill SB1737

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the enforcement of conciliation agreements entered into under the Texas Fair Housing Act.

Impact

The proposed changes in SB 1737 primarily affect the enforcement of housing protections as outlined in the Texas Fair Housing Act. By mandating that the commission refer potential breaches of conciliation agreements to the attorney general, the bill strengthens the legal framework available for victims of housing discrimination. This could lead to more robust enforcement of fair housing laws, potentially mitigating violations and providing greater assurance to residents concerning their housing rights.

Summary

Senate Bill 1737 aims to enhance the enforcement mechanisms related to conciliation agreements established under the Texas Fair Housing Act. This bill specifically authorizes the commission to monitor compliance with these agreements and stipulates that upon discovering a potential breach, the commission must notify the attorney general. The attorney general can then initiate civil action to enforce the terms of the conciliation agreement. This change is intended to provide a clearer pathway for upholding housing rights and ensuring compliance with fair housing statutes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1737 appears to be generally supportive among advocates for fair housing and civil rights. Proponents argue that enhancing enforcement mechanisms is a critical step in combating housing discrimination and protecting vulnerable populations. Conversely, some stakeholders may express concerns about the implications of increased enforcement, particularly regarding the potential burdens placed on property owners or housing providers who may face legal actions due to noncompliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 1737 may arise from discussions about the balance between enforcing fair housing laws and the implications of potential civil actions against respondents. Critics may worry that the bill could lead to an uptick in legal disputes, while supporters contend that the measure is necessary for effective enforcement. The conversation about SB 1737 thus encapsulates broader debates about housing rights and the responsibilities of property owners under state law.