Texas Senate Bill SB1913

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the administrative, civil, and criminal consequences, including fines, fees, and costs, imposed on persons arrested for, charged with, or convicted of certain criminal offenses.

Impact

The bill introduces significant changes to existing laws, particularly regarding the Code of Criminal Procedure. It mandates that before imposing fines, judges must inquire about a defendant's financial capability to pay. If the court finds that the defendant lacks sufficient resources, it can opt for alternative measures like community service or deferred payment plans. This approach seeks to alleviate the burden on low-income individuals who may face hardship in fulfilling monetary obligations, thereby reducing the cycle of fines leading to additional penalties, such as license suspension or jail time for non-payment.

Summary

Senate Bill 1913 addresses the administrative, civil, and criminal consequences linked to fines, fees, and costs imposed on individuals arrested for, charged with, or convicted of certain criminal offenses. This legislation aims to reform the way fines and associated costs are levied and the factors that influence their collection. Key provisions include the need for judicial inquiry into a defendant's ability to pay fines and the introduction of community service as an alternative means to satisfy debts related to court penalties. SB1913 provides a structure for courts to consider the financial situation of defendants, particularly emphasizing assistance for those identified as indigent.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1913 is largely supportive among advocates for criminal justice reform and social equity. Proponents argue that the bill is a positive step towards ensuring that the penal system does not disproportionately affect low-income individuals. However, there are concerns among some legislators regarding the potential for increased administrative burdens on courts and law enforcement agencies as they adapt to the new standards of compliance and enforcement. Overall, the discourse around the bill reflects a desire for a more just and equitable system while balancing concerns about practical implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB1913 center around the concerns of law enforcement and local governments about revenue associated with fines and fees. Critics are wary of the potential loss of funding that helps support local budgets, should compliance and collections decrease among those unable to pay. Conversely, advocates highlight the moral obligation to avoid incarcerating individuals simply for being unable to pay fines, arguing that the costs to society are ultimately greater than the revenue generated by these fines. As such, the bill raises fundamental questions about the balance between generating revenue and ensuring a fair justice system.