Relating to the procedure for action on certain applications for an amendment to a water right.
Impact
If passed, SB226 would impact state laws governing water rights by reducing the procedural burdens on applicants. The bill proposes that particular amendments, such as adding usage locations within the same basin or altering diversion points under specified conditions, would no longer require extended procedural requirements. This regulatory update aims to enhance the efficiency of the amendment process and potentially increase the capability of users to adapt their water rights according to evolving needs while ensuring that significant alterations to rights still undergo rigorous scrutiny.
Summary
Senate Bill 226, introduced by Senator Perry, seeks to streamline the procedure for amending water rights in Texas. The bill modifies the existing regulatory framework by exempting certain modifications to water rights from the usual requirements for public notice, contested hearings, and technical reviews, provided that the changes do not significantly alter the original rights granted. This change is designed to make it easier for applicants to amend their water rights efficiently, particularly for minor alterations such as changes in the point of diversion or adjustments to the purposes of use as long as they align with the original rights.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB226 is mixed, reflecting a tension between efficiency in administrative processing and the necessity for comprehensive regulatory oversight. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for promoting economic opportunities and adapting to new water management practices, while critics express concerns that exempting certain amendments from scrutiny could lead to adverse effects on water resources and management. This division signifies broader implications for operational practices within water usage across Texas.
Contention
Notable points of contention around SB226 relate to the balance between expedited processes and environmental safeguards. Critics worry that by easing requirements for amending water rights, the bill could inadvertently encourage over-extraction or mismanagement of water resources without adequate oversight. The discussion highlights vital considerations about sustainability and the need for ensuring comprehensive reviews of changes that could significantly impact water availability and environmental health.
Relating to the procedures for acting on a permit or permit amendment application by a groundwater conservation district and the disqualification of board members of groundwater conservation districts.
Relating to the procedures for acting on a permit or permit amendment application by a groundwater conservation district and the disqualification of board members of groundwater conservation districts.
Relating to an application for emergency detention, procedures regarding court-ordered mental health services, and certain rights of patients admitted to private mental hospitals and certain other mental health facilities.
Relating to the rights of victims of sexual assault and to certain procedures and reimbursements occurring with respect to a sexual assault or other sex offense.