Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB56 Introduced / Analysis

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS        Senate Research Center   S.B. 56     85R1107 AAF-D   By: Zaffirini         Business & Commerce         2/8/2017         As Filed          AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT   The State of Texas increasingly relies on technology to manage the personal information of more than 26 million citizens and to run its infrastructure efficiently. Accordingly, the establishment of a robust cyber-protection system must be a priority for state agencies. Cybersecurity experts indicate that one of the main causes of cyber-attacks that compromise the personal information of millions of private companies' customers is the lack of direct communication between the companies' cybersecurity officers and the companies' leadership. State agencies are exposed to the same risk of suffering cyber-attacks as private companies. Most agencies designate their Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) to prepare and submit a biennial cybersecurity plan to the Department of Information Resources (DIR), but the agency's leadership is not required to confer with its CISO regarding these cybersecurity plans. S.B. 56 would require agency leadership to sign the agencies' biennial cybersecurity plans to improve communication and accountability regarding cybersecurity programs.   As proposed, S.B. 56 amends current law relating to the acknowledgment by management of risks identified in state agency information security plans.   RULEMAKING AUTHORITY   This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.   SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS   SECTION 1. Amends Section 2054.133, Government Code, by adding Subsection (e) to require that each state agency include in the agency's information security plan a written acknowledgement that certain named individuals designated by the state agency have been made aware of the risks revealed during the preparation of the agency's information security plan.   SECTION 2. Effective date: September 1, 2017.           

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

Senate Research Center S.B. 56
85R1107 AAF-D By: Zaffirini
 Business & Commerce
 2/8/2017
 As Filed

Senate Research Center

S.B. 56

85R1107 AAF-D

By: Zaffirini

 

Business & Commerce

 

2/8/2017

 

As Filed

 

 

 

AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

 

The State of Texas increasingly relies on technology to manage the personal information of more than 26 million citizens and to run its infrastructure efficiently. Accordingly, the establishment of a robust cyber-protection system must be a priority for state agencies. Cybersecurity experts indicate that one of the main causes of cyber-attacks that compromise the personal information of millions of private companies' customers is the lack of direct communication between the companies' cybersecurity officers and the companies' leadership. State agencies are exposed to the same risk of suffering cyber-attacks as private companies. Most agencies designate their Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) to prepare and submit a biennial cybersecurity plan to the Department of Information Resources (DIR), but the agency's leadership is not required to confer with its CISO regarding these cybersecurity plans. S.B. 56 would require agency leadership to sign the agencies' biennial cybersecurity plans to improve communication and accountability regarding cybersecurity programs.

 

As proposed, S.B. 56 amends current law relating to the acknowledgment by management of risks identified in state agency information security plans.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.

 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1. Amends Section 2054.133, Government Code, by adding Subsection (e) to require that each state agency include in the agency's information security plan a written acknowledgement that certain named individuals designated by the state agency have been made aware of the risks revealed during the preparation of the agency's information security plan.

 

SECTION 2. Effective date: September 1, 2017.