Texas Senate Bill SB778

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the appointment of school marshals by public schools and the ammunition approved for use by a school marshal serving a public school or a public junior college.

Impact

The implications of SB778 on state laws are significant since it modifies existing regulations that govern the presence of firearms in educational environments. The introduction of the provision for school marshals to carry concealed handguns, with restrictions based on their duties, is expected to stir discussions on public safety and the role of armed personnel in schools. This law aims to enhance security measures by allowing trained individuals to respond to threats within educational settings, reflecting ongoing debates about school safety improvements across Texas.

Summary

SB778 proposes amendments to the Education Code concerning the appointment of school marshals in public schools and public junior colleges. Specifically, the bill allows school districts or charter schools to appoint one school marshal for every 200 students in average daily attendance, or one per building. This is a reduction from the previous stipulation of one marshal per 400 students, thereby increasing potential armed oversight within school settings. Additionally, the bill outlines that school marshals may carry handguns, but those primarily in contact with students can only store a handgun in a secured safe rather than carry it directly.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB778 likely include debates over the appropriateness of introducing firearms into schools and the responsibilities placed on school marshals. Advocates argue that proper training and presence of marshals are essential for deterring potential threats and ensuring rapid response to emergencies. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns about the implications of having armed personnel in educational institutions, the potential for accidents or misuse of firearms, and the broader social implications of normalizing guns in schools. These discussions highlight a division in public opinion regarding safety versus the risks involved with arming school personnel.