Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB988

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the participation of a county judge in a meeting of a commissioners court conducted by videoconference call.

Impact

The implementation of SB988 directly affects the functions of county judges and the procedural conduct of commissioners courts in Texas. It ensures that any meeting held under the state's open meetings law—specifically the provisions for videoconferences—will require the presiding county judge to be at a designated physical location. This impacts the administrative handling of public meetings and the accountability of local government officials, especially in the context of increasing reliance on telecommuting and digital communication methods in governmental processes.

Summary

SB988 is a legislative bill that modifies the participation rules for county judges in Texas during meetings of the commissioners court conducted by videoconference. The primary intent of this bill is to clarify the presiding authorities in such meetings, stipulating that a county judge is only considered the presiding officer if they are physically present at the location designated for public attendance. This change aims to enhance the legal framework surrounding remote meetings and align with evolving technological practices in local governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB988 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among legislators who recognize the need for legal clarity in light of modern communication methods. The bill was passed unanimously by the Texas House, indicating strong bipartisan support. However, there are concerns regarding potential implications for accessibility and the effectiveness of remote participation for officials and the public, showcasing a need for balancing tradition with modern operational realities.

Contention

While SB988 did not face significant opposition during the legislative process, some members expressed concerns about ensuring public engagement in the new format of meetings. Critics argue that requiring county judges to be physically present may limit flexibility and may hinder the ability to conduct business seamlessly, especially in situations where traveling to a designated meeting location could pose challenges. The nuances of implementing such a stipulation warrant attention to maintain public interest and trust in local government processes.

Companion Bills

TX HB536

Identical Relating to the participation of a county judge in a meeting of a commissioners court conducted by videoconference call.

Previously Filed As

TX HB784

Relating to the delegation of certain authority of a county judge or commissioners court in certain counties.

TX SB542

Relating to the delegation of certain authority of a county judge or commissioners court in certain counties.

TX SB2155

Relating to the authority to appear by telephone or videoconference in municipal and justice courts.

TX HB4258

Relating to meetings of a county election board.

TX HB3386

Relating to the criminal district courts, statutory county courts, and criminal law magistrates in Tarrant County.

TX HB103

Relating to the appointment of a retired or former judge as a visiting judge in certain counties.

TX HB4928

Relating to the continuation of certain health care provider participation programs in certain counties.

TX SB1173

Relating to the appointment of criminal law hearing officers and of a special presiding judge and associate judges for certain courts.

TX HB779

Relating to the issuance of certain search warrants by statutory county court judges.

TX HB1923

Relating to videoconferencing with a child by the child's possessory conservator.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.