Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Note
The proposed amendment mandates that its implementation be put to a statewide vote, indicating that the final determination of the amendment's fate lies in the hands of Texas voters. This ensures that the public has a say in such a significant change to state law, setting the stage for heated campaigning on both sides leading up to the election.
Impact
If passed, SJR16 would significantly alter the legal landscape regarding marriage in Texas. Specifically, it would dismantle existing constitutional prohibitions against same-sex marriage and enable the state or local subdivisions to recognize different forms of legal unions that are equivalent to marriage. This change would likely allow same-sex couples access to traditional marriage benefits, impacting areas such as taxation, inheritance rights, and healthcare decisions, thereby fostering a more inclusive society.
Summary
SJR16 is a proposed joint resolution aimed at amending the Texas Constitution to repeal the existing provision which defines marriage strictly as the union of one man and one woman. The key objective of this resolution is to remove legal barriers faced by same-sex couples and allow for a more inclusive definition of marriage within the state. The bill emphasizes the importance of equality and civil rights, seeking to align Texas state law with broader national trends toward marriage equality.
Contention
Discussions surrounding SJR16 are likely to be contentious, as the issue of marriage equality remains polarizing within various segments of Texas society. Proponents argue that repealing the marriage definition fosters equality and protects the rights of all citizens to love whom they choose. On the other hand, opponents may view the amendment as an attack on traditional family values, leading to a significant pushback from conservative groups and individuals opposed to changing the cultural perception of marriage.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Relating to the prohibition of face covering mandates by this state and political subdivisions of this state in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; providing exceptions.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to the identification of constitutional or statutory provisions of this state that have been invalidated or otherwise limited by a state appellate court.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision that prohibits the appropriation of state money or property for the benefit of any sect, religious society, or theological or religious seminary.