Proposing a constitutional amendment prohibiting the appropriation or distribution of state money for the performance of an elective abortion or to a person or entity that performs or assists in performing an elective abortion.
If passed, the amendment would have significant implications for reproductive health services in Texas. It asserts a strong position against state funding for elective abortions, which could lead to the discontinuation of monetary support for critical health organizations that provide a wide range of services, including family planning and pre-natal care. Thus, the resolution could result in reduced access to reproductive healthcare for individuals seeking elective abortions, impacting vulnerable populations and their rights to healthcare.
HJR28 is a joint resolution proposing to amend the Texas Constitution to prohibit the appropriation or distribution of state money for elective abortions. This measure aims to restrict financial support to agencies, political subdivisions, or any entity involved in performing or assisting with elective abortions. The resolution emphasizes that no state funds should be allocated for such purposes, effectively removing state financial assistance from related organizations and services. It is important to note that this amendment would only apply as far as permitted by federal law.
The introduction of HJR28 has sparked considerable debate among various stakeholder groups. Supporters argue that it protects taxpayer money from being used for abortions, positioning it as a moral issue within the conservative framework. On the other hand, opponents contend that this resolution undermines access to essential health services and infringes on personal autonomy regarding reproductive choices. Critics also raise concerns that the prohibition of state funding could disproportionately affect low-income individuals who may rely on those services for healthcare.
The bill was set to be submitted to voters on November 6, 2018, presenting the opportunity for a public vote on the constitutional amendment. The focus on voter involvement demonstrates the contentious nature of the topic, highlighting differing perspectives on reproductive rights within the state and the potential influence of public opinion on the passage of such significant legislative changes.