Texas House Bill HJR29

Texas 2017 - 85th 1st C.S.

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment prohibiting the authorization or funding of an elementary or secondary education voucher program or similar program.

Impact

The proposed constitutional amendment would have significant ramifications for the state's educational landscape. By ensuring that state revenues cannot be used for private school tuition, HJR29 seeks to solidify the commitment to public education. This has implications for how educational funding is structured and prioritized within Texas, reinforcing support for public schools at the potential expense of private educational alternatives. Consequently, the bill aims to protect public education funding from alternative uses, which is a contentious issue in many legislative debates surrounding educational reform.

Voting

The resolution is expected to be submitted for voter approval at an election slated for November 6, 2018. The ballot will present voters with the opportunity to directly influence this issue, aiming to gauge public sentiment on the use of state funds for education. The outcome of this vote will not only determine the fate of HJR29 but also reflect the electorate's stance on education funding priorities in Texas.

Summary

HJR29 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that expressly prohibits the authorization or funding of any form of voucher program intended for elementary or secondary education. This includes vouchers, education savings accounts, tax credit scholarship programs, or similar mechanisms where state revenue covers the costs associated with attending private schools. The bill directly pertains to how public funding is allocated within the state's education system, aiming to preserve the integrity of public educational funding by preventing public funds from being diverted to private institutions.

Contention

Debate surrounding HJR29 highlights a division among lawmakers and stakeholders regarding educational choice and funding. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to maintain a well-funded and effective public education system, which is seen as a cornerstone of the state's responsibilities. On the other hand, opponents may argue that the resolution limits parental choice in education and does not consider diverse educational needs. The discussion ties into broader themes around educational equity and the role of private versus public education in the state's future.