Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1615

Caption

Relating to the state's burden of proof in certain asset forfeiture proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Impact

If enacted, HB1615 would significantly alter the legal landscape regarding asset forfeiture in Texas. The amendments proposed in the bill would safeguard individuals who can demonstrate that they acquired their interests in the property without knowledge of its illicit use. This change is expected to provide more robust defenses for property owners, potentially reducing the frequency of unjust asset seizures and promoting fairer legal proceedings in forfeiture cases.

Summary

House Bill 1615 aims to change the burden of proof in asset forfeiture proceedings in Texas. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislation proposes that the state must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that certain conditions do not apply to property subject to seizure and forfeiture. Previously, an owner or interest holder had to establish their case to prevent forfeiture, but this bill shifts the responsibility to the state, adding a layer of protection for property owners against wrongful seizures.

Contention

Despite its protective intent, the bill may raise concerns among law enforcement and prosecutors who argue that it could complicate and hinder the process of asset forfeiture necessary for combatting crime. Some stakeholders may view the proposed changes as a barrier to successfully prosecuting criminal cases where asset forfeiture plays a crucial role. Therefore, while supporters emphasize the need for property rights and due process, critics may worry about its implications on public safety and law enforcement effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA SB359

Provides for civil forfeiture reform. (8/1/22)

HI SB149

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

HI HB1965

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

CA AB1317

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

AZ HB2324

Forfeiture; digital assets; reserve fund

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

CA AB603

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

KS SB458

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, providing limitations on state and local law enforcement agency requests for federal adoption of a seizure under the act, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence forfeiture proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence, authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants and requiring the Kansas bureau of investigation to submit forfeiture fund financial reports to the legislature.