Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3376 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 By: Klick H.B. No. 3376
22
33
44 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
55 AN ACT
66 relating to the review of ballot proposition language for certain
77 political subdivision elections.
88 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
99 SECTION 1. Subchapter C, Chapter 52, Election Code, is
1010 amended by adding Section 52.0721 to read as follows:
1111 Sec. 52.0721. REVIEW OF BALLOT PROPOSITION LANGUAGE. (a)
1212 This section applies only to an election on a measure held by a
1313 political subdivision located primarily in a county with a
1414 population of more than 120,000. This section does not apply to an
1515 election for which a statute provides the ballot proposition
1616 language.
1717 (b) Not later than the 123rd day before an election, a
1818 political subdivision seeking to hold an election on a measure
1919 shall submit to the regional presiding judge of the administrative
2020 judicial region that the political subdivision is located in:
2121 (1) the ballot proposition language; and
2222 (2) a brief statement on the purpose of the
2323 proposition.
2424 (c) A political subdivision that is located in two or more
2525 administrative judicial regions may select the administrative
2626 judicial region to which the political subdivision submits the
2727 proposition language for review.
2828 (d) A regional presiding judge shall appoint three judges
2929 from the administrative judicial region to serve on a panel to
3030 review ballot proposition language.
3131 (e) Not later than the 45th day after the receipt by the
3232 presiding judge of the ballot proposition language, the panel
3333 shall:
3434 (1) approve the ballot proposition language under
3535 Subsection (f); or
3636 (2) disapprove the ballot proposition language and
3737 provide the political subdivision with rewritten ballot
3838 proposition language under Subsection (g).
3939 (f) If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
4040 clear and understandable to the average voter, the panel shall
4141 approve the language of the proposition for the ballot.
4242 (g) If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
4343 not clear and understandable to the average voter, the language is
4444 disapproved and may not be used on the ballot at the election. The
4545 panel shall provide the political subdivision with rewritten ballot
4646 proposition language that is clear and understandable to the
4747 average voter for use in the election.
4848 (h) Following disapproval under Subsection (g), the
4949 political subdivision may:
5050 (1) hold the election with the rewritten ballot
5151 proposition language provided by the panel; or
5252 (2) submit revised ballot proposition language for
5353 approval by the panel in the manner provided under Subsections (f)
5454 and (g).
5555 (i) To the extent of a conflict between this section and any
5656 provision of law requiring a political subdivision to hold an
5757 election on a measure within a certain period, this section
5858 controls.
5959 SECTION 2. (a)
6060 The change in law made by this Act applies
6161 only to an election ordered on or after the effective date of this
6262 Act. An election ordered before the effective date of this Act is
6363 governed by the law in effect when the election was ordered, and the
6464 former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
6565 (b) Not later than February 1, 2020, each regional presiding
6666 judge of an administrative judicial region shall appoint three
6767 judges from the administrative judicial region to serve on a panel
6868 to review ballot proposition language.
6969 SECTION 3. This Act takes effect January 1, 2020.