Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3376 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 03/06/2019

                            By: Klick H.B. No. 3376


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the review of ballot proposition language for certain
 political subdivision elections.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subchapter C, Chapter 52, Election Code, is
 amended by adding Section 52.0721 to read as follows:
 Sec. 52.0721.  REVIEW OF BALLOT PROPOSITION LANGUAGE. (a)
 This section applies only to an election on a measure held by a
 political subdivision located primarily in a county with a
 population of more than 120,000. This section does not apply to an
 election for which a statute provides the ballot proposition
 language.
 (b)  Not later than the 123rd day before an election, a
 political subdivision seeking to hold an election on a measure
 shall submit to the regional presiding judge of the administrative
 judicial region that the political subdivision is located in:
 (1)  the ballot proposition language; and
 (2)  a brief statement on the purpose of the
 proposition.
 (c)  A political subdivision that is located in two or more
 administrative judicial regions may select the administrative
 judicial region to which the political subdivision submits the
 proposition language for review.
 (d)  A regional presiding judge shall appoint three judges
 from the administrative judicial region to serve on a panel to
 review ballot proposition language.
 (e)  Not later than the 45th day after the receipt by the
 presiding judge of the ballot proposition language, the panel
 shall:
 (1)  approve the ballot proposition language under
 Subsection (f); or
 (2)  disapprove the ballot proposition language and
 provide the political subdivision with rewritten ballot
 proposition language under Subsection (g).
 (f)  If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
 clear and understandable to the average voter, the panel shall
 approve the language of the proposition for the ballot.
 (g)  If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
 not clear and understandable to the average voter, the language is
 disapproved and may not be used on the ballot at the election. The
 panel shall provide the political subdivision with rewritten ballot
 proposition language that is clear and understandable to the
 average voter for use in the election.
 (h)  Following disapproval under Subsection (g), the
 political subdivision may:
 (1)  hold the election with the rewritten ballot
 proposition language provided by the panel; or
 (2)  submit revised ballot proposition language for
 approval by the panel in the manner provided under Subsections (f)
 and (g).
 (i)  To the extent of a conflict between this section and any
 provision of law requiring a political subdivision to hold an
 election on a measure within a certain period, this section
 controls.
 SECTION 2.  (a)
 The change in law made by this Act applies
 only to an election ordered on or after the effective date of this
 Act. An election ordered before the effective date of this Act is
 governed by the law in effect when the election was ordered, and the
 former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
 (b)  Not later than February 1, 2020, each regional presiding
 judge of an administrative judicial region shall appoint three
 judges from the administrative judicial region to serve on a panel
 to review ballot proposition language.
 SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect January 1, 2020.