Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3383

Caption

Relating to the definition of a tier 1 county for purposes of municipal annexation.

Impact

If enacted, HB3383 would directly affect municipal laws regarding annexation procedures, providing a clearer classification for tier 1 counties. The bill's primary intent is to streamline and update the existing regulations to reflect changes in Texas's population dynamics and urban development patterns. By establishing a more precise definition, the bill could facilitate discussions and decisions on annexation, influencing local governance and planning strategies.

Summary

House Bill 3383 aims to redefine the criteria for determining what constitutes a 'tier 1 county' in Texas, particularly concerning municipal annexation. Under the bill, a tier 1 county is defined as one with a population of less than 500,000, excluding those with certain geographical and demographic characteristics such as proximity to more populous counties or the presence of municipal utility districts. The purpose of this redefinition is to clarify the framework around municipal annexation and potentially ease the processes associated with it in specific areas of the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3383 appears to be largely supportive, as the bill received significant affirmative votes during its passage through the legislative process, with 139 yeas and no nays recorded during the final vote. This unanimous support suggests that legislators from various backgrounds recognize the importance of updating local governance frameworks to adapt to changing urban landscapes. However, there may still be underlying concerns regarding local impacts of annexation and the balance of power between municipalities and county governance.

Contention

While there was strong support for HB3383, no explicit points of contention were identified in the voting history. However, discussions about municipal annexation often face scrutiny related to potential disputes over land use and local community decisions. Stakeholders may debate the implications of annexation practices and how they affect community representation, local needs, and land management. As with many legislative changes, ongoing dialogue among community members and local governments will be essential to address any emerging concerns after the bill's implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB442

Relating to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of and municipal annexation by certain municipalities.

TX HB4981

Relating to eligible central municipalities for purposes of municipal hotel occupancy taxes.

TX HB630

Relating to the provision of lifeguards by certain municipalities and counties on public beaches.

TX HB4494

Relating to eligible coastal municipalities for purposes of the municipal hotel occupancy tax.

TX HB586

Relating to municipal annexation of certain rights-of-way.

TX HB3328

Relating to the authority of certain counties and municipalities to regulate certain subdivisions in a municipality's extraterritorial jurisdiction.

TX HB1204

Relating to the authority of a municipality to remove territory from an emergency services district following annexation.

TX HB2282

Relating to the use of hotel occupancy tax revenue by certain municipalities and counties and the authority of certain municipalities to receive certain tax revenue derived from a hotel and convention center project and to pledge certain tax revenue for the payment of obligations related to the project.

TX SB940

Relating to the use of hotel occupancy tax revenue by certain municipalities and counties and the authority of certain municipalities to receive certain tax revenue derived from a hotel and convention center project and to pledge certain tax revenue for the payment of obligations related to the project.

TX SB1208

Relating to the hotel occupancy tax imposed by certain rural counties and by municipalities located in those counties and to the use of revenue from that tax.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.