Texas House Bill HB4552

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to high quality standards for out of school and extended learning opportunity programs.

Impact

Upon enactment, this bill will amend Chapter 33 of the Education Code by adding a new section dedicated specifically to high-quality standards for extended learning. This change is significant because it formally recognizes and seeks to govern the realm of out-of-school activities, which can vary greatly in quality and execution. By mandating standards, HB4552 not only promotes uniformity among programs but also places a legislative emphasis on the importance of the educational experiences provided outside the standard curriculum. This can lead to improved educational equity, especially for students who require additional support.

Summary

House Bill 4552 aims to establish high-quality standards for out-of-school and extended learning opportunity programs. This legislation is focused on enhancing the educational outcomes of programs that are intended to support students outside traditional classroom settings. The bill outlines the framework within which these programs are to operate, effectively prioritizing quality and consistency across various educational entities that provide these extended learning opportunities. Establishing these standards is intended to ensure that all students have access to effective and enriching educational experiences outside regular school hours.

Contention

While supporters of HB4552 may view these new standards as a means to enhance educational quality, there could be debates surrounding the implementation and assessment of these standards. Concerns may arise around the resources required for programs to meet these standards, potentially leading to disparities in compliance based on funding and administrative capabilities. Moreover, opponents might argue that such regulations could limit the flexibility and creativity of programs that currently operate according to their unique community needs. Therefore, the balance between quality control and local program autonomy is likely to be a focal point of contention.