Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB702

Caption

Relating to creating a voluntary program to recognize licensed before-school and after-school programs that promote healthy eating and physical activity.

Impact

If enacted, HB 702 would amend the Human Resources Code to introduce Section 42.0429, establishing a clear set of criteria that programs must meet to obtain recognition. These criteria include staff training on healthy practices, limits on screen time, and the provision of healthy food options. Programs could earn different levels of recognition—bronze, silver, or gold—based on their adherence to these standards. This initiative is positioned as a step towards significantly improving children's health and combating issues such as childhood obesity by instilling better nutritional and physical habits from an early age.

Summary

House Bill 702 aims to create a voluntary program in Texas that recognizes licensed before-school and after-school programs which promote healthy eating and physical activity among children. The program seeks to enhance the quality of care provided to children during these hours by establishing and enforcing criteria that ensure children engage in adequate physical activity while also being served nutritious meals. By implementing this recognition program, the bill intends to encourage the adoption of health-oriented practices within educational and recreational settings for children.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 702 appears to be positive, with many stakeholders emphasizing the importance of fostering a healthy environment for children. Legislators and health advocates advocate for the need to support programs that prioritize children's well-being. However, while proponents are optimistic about the bill's potential benefits, there may be concerns related to program compliance and resource allocation, particularly for programs with limited budgets that may struggle to meet the new standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 702 revolve around the feasibility and implementation of the recognition program. Critics express concerns regarding the additional burden that may be placed on programs—especially smaller or less funded ones—to meet the recognition requirements. There exists an ongoing debate on whether the incentives associated with recognition will be enough to encourage widespread compliance and improvement among similar programs across Texas. Stakeholders suggest balancing the desire for improved health outcomes with a realistic assessment of available resources and any potential challenges these programs might face.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2261

Facial recognition technology.

GA HB1245

Law enforcement officers and agencies; facial recognition technology; provisions

CA AB1395

Information privacy: other connected device with a voice recognition feature.

HI HB1226

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.

HI SB156

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.

CO SB113

Artificial Intelligence Facial Recognition

HI HB1869

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.

HI SB2005

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.