Relating to updating references to certain former health services state agencies and certain terms used to describe persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities in the Education Code.
With the enactment of HB 965, significant amendments were made to various sections of the Education Code. These include provisions for students with physical, intellectual, or developmental disabilities to ensure their eligibility for special education programs, and clarify the responsibilities of educational and health agencies in delivering proper services. Additionally, the bill mandates the development of a memorandum of understanding among relevant agencies to define their collaborative efforts in providing a free and appropriate public education, especially for students residing in residential facilities.
House Bill 965 focuses on revising the Texas Education Code to update references related to certain former health services state agencies and to reframe the terminology used to describe individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities. The bill aims to modernize the language in the Education Code, ensuring that it aligns with current standards and practices in both education and health services. The adjustments include changes to eligibility criteria for special education programs and the responsibilities of school districts and residential facilities in providing educational services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
The sentiment surrounding HB 965 appears to be generally positive, especially among advocates for individuals with disabilities. Supporters appreciate the bill's intent to enhance services and protections for students needing special education by updating outdated terminologies and processes. Nonetheless, there are concerns regarding the implementation of these new provisions, particularly about ensuring adequate training and resources for educators and staff to adapt to the revised language and standards.
Although there seems to be a consensus on the need for updated language within the Education Code, some potential points of contention could arise regarding the accurate implementation of the provisions and the need for sufficient funding to support the educational resources required by school districts. Opponents may argue about the practical challenges of accommodating the legislative changes, particularly the financial implications for school districts that already face budgetary constraints.