Urging Congress to abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The resolution suggests that by targeting undocumented immigrants instead of focusing primarily on national security threats, ICE has created a breakdown in community trust and strained relationships with local law enforcement. The bill brings attention to the negative consequences of ICE's practices, particularly its aggressive detention and deportation policies, which have allegedly led to the separation of families and increased surveillance in communities of color. These concerns reflect a broader debate over immigration enforcement and human rights.
HCR34 is a concurrent resolution that urges the United States Congress to abolish the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The bill critiques ICE for straying from its original mission, presenting the agency as a mass-deportation force incompatible with democratic and human rights values. It highlights the post-9/11 creation of ICE, intended to bolster national security, but argues that it has since become overly focused on deportation rather than its intended goal of combating terrorism and organized crime.
HCR34 reflects a growing movement advocating for a reevaluation of how the United States addresses immigration enforcement and the protection of human rights. By urging for the abolition of ICE, the resolution seeks to reposition immigration enforcement within a framework that acknowledges the contributions of immigrants to society and emphasizes humane treatment, aligning immigration policies with constitutional and international obligations.
Notable points of contention include the ongoing debate surrounding the function and effectiveness of ICE. The bill asserts that many of ICE's operations undermine its critical role in national security and that its controversial actions have led to significant public backlash. The discussion highlights the call from special agents within ICE who have requested to separate the Homeland Security Investigations division from the agency due to concerns that their work has been compromised by ICE’s focus on deportation.