Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring elections on proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution to be held in November of even-numbered years.
The bill's passage would require a two-thirds majority in both legislative houses for approval, and importantly, it would set the first scheduled election for November 3, 2020, thereby aligning future constitutional amendments along this timeline.
The introduction of HJR91 could significantly alter how and when Texan voters engage with proposed amendments to their state constitution. By aligning amendment elections with traditional general elections in November, the bill aims to ensure that a larger segment of the population is present to cast their votes. This could lead to a more representative outcome for amendments, as voter turnout tends to be higher during general elections compared to off-cycle elections. Consequently, proponents argue that this method could enhance democratic participation and provide a clearer mandate for any amendments passed.
HJR91 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that mandates elections on proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution be held in November of even-numbered years. The amendment specifically seeks to modify Section 1(a), Article XVII of the Texas Constitution to stipulate that any changes to the constitution must occur during these specified elections, which are traditionally characterized by higher voter turnout due to other statewide races occurring concurrently. This proposal is intended to consolidate voting for constitutional amendments, potentially increasing public attention and engagement with such issues.
While supporters of HJR91 emphasize the benefits of increased voter participation, there may be concerns regarding how this change affects the legislative process for proposing amendments. Critics might argue that coupling amendments with general elections could politicize constitutional changes, overshadowing the specific intent and details of the amendments themselves. Additionally, there might be apprehensions about whether this could lead to a simplification of complex issues during elections, forcing voters to engage with nuanced legal changes in a less informed setting.