Texas Senate Bill SB1995

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the review of certain occupational licensing rules by the office of the governor.

Impact

The introduction of SB 1995 is set to impact state laws significantly by introducing oversight of occupational licensing regulations that could otherwise limit competition. The bill mandates that a director, appointed by the governor and possessing relevant legal experience, oversee the review process including public input and analysis of proposed rules. The requirements outlined will likely compel agencies to reconsider their licensing rules more carefully, potentially reducing bureaucratic hurdles and promoting competitive fairness in various professions and businesses.

Summary

Senate Bill 1995 establishes a framework for the review of occupational licensing rules by the office of the governor in Texas. This legislation aims to ensure that proposed rules affecting market competition are thoroughly assessed before being adopted or implemented by state agencies. The bill enforces a system where any state agency that issues a license must submit rules that may impact market competition for review to a newly established division within the governor's office. The intention is to promote fairness and prevent any rules that create barriers to market entry or lead to higher prices.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 1995 appears to focus on the balance between regulation and market freedom. Proponents see it as a necessary check on state agencies to reduce unnecessary barriers to entry for businesses and professionals, enhancing economic competitiveness within Texas. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the possible complications this bill could introduce in the rule-making process, as it increases the involvement of the governor’s office at the expense of agency autonomy.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 1995 include discussions on the role of trade associations in the formation of governing boards for state agencies, with the bill ensuring that membership in such associations is not a prerequisite for service. Critics express caution that while the intention behind the bill is to streamline regulation, it may inadvertently lead to delays in rule enactment and enforcement, as agencies will need to navigate additional layers of scrutiny and approval. The bill thus raises questions about the appropriate balance between state oversight and the operational efficiency of regulatory agencies.