Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1061

Caption

Relating to background and criminal history checks for operators and employees of certain child-care facilities.

Impact

The implementation of SB1061 is expected to have significant repercussions on the regulatory landscape for childcare facilities. With the bill's rules and requirements, there will be a uniform standard for background checks across the state, streamlining the process for both the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and childcare operators. By requiring comprehensive criminal history checks, the bill seeks to prevent individuals with potentially harmful backgrounds from working with children, fostering a safer childcare environment and potentially improving public trust in these facilities.

Summary

SB1061, relating to background and criminal history checks for operators and employees of certain child-care facilities, aims to enhance the safety and security measures for childcare environments in Texas. The bill mandates that all individuals involved in the operation of childcare facilities undergo thorough background checks, including both state and FBI criminal history checks. The provision of needing a complete set of fingerprints for these checks is intended to ensure a more robust vetting process, ultimately aimed at safeguarding children in care settings.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB1061 appears to be largely supportive, reflecting a consensus on the necessity of increased safety measures in childcare settings. Many advocates and bipartisan lawmakers emphasize the importance of protecting children from potential harm, viewing the background checks as a crucial step in enhancing the quality of care provided. However, there may also be concerns raised regarding the implications of extensive background checks on hiring practices and the accessibility of qualified personnel in the childcare industry, particularly for those with checkered pasts who may seek to reform.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1061 could arise from the broader implications of such stringent background requirements. While supporters argue that a robust vetting process is essential for child safety, some critics may raise concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of background checks, particularly regarding how they may disproportionately affect job seekers. Additionally, the bureaucratic nature of implementing these checks could provoke discussions about potential delays and costs involved, which may inadvertently hinder the hiring process in the childcare sector.

Companion Bills

TX SB1153

Same As Relating to background and criminal history checks for operators and employees of certain child-care facilities.

Similar Bills

MO SB636

Modifies provisions relating to background checks for certain applicants of agencies, boards, and commissions

CO HB1270

Change Term Name-based Criminal History Record Check

AZ SB1266

Qualified schools; fingerprinting requirements; penalties

AZ HB2688

Qualified schools; fingerprinting requirements; penalties.

AZ SB1136

Schools; noncertificated personnel; background investigations

CA AB3235

Fingerprint rollers and custodians of records.

LA HB604

Provides relative to expungement of records (RR1 INCREASE GF EX See Note)

CO SB146

Fingerprint-Based Criminal History Record Checks