Relating to address confidentiality on certain documents for certain federal officials and family members of certain federal officials or federal or state court judges.
Impact
If enacted, SB1134 will significantly impact the way personal information about federal and state judges and their family members is handled in public documents. By omitting their residence addresses, the bill aims to mitigate the risks these individuals face and is particularly relevant for those dealing with sensitive situations, such as victims of violence who may seek similar protections. This is also intended to align state laws with the necessities of protecting public officials and their families from potential harm.
Summary
SB1134 aims to enhance address confidentiality protections for certain federal officials, including federal judges, their family members, and state judges. The bill provides for the redaction of residence addresses from public documents to safeguard these individuals from potential threats. By amending various sections of the Election Code, Transportation Code, and Government Code, the bill attempts to create a more secure environment for those who are often in high-risk positions due to their roles in the judicial system.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB1134 appears to be largely supportive, especially among those concerned with the safety of judicial officials. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate and had a favorable receiving in the House, indicating broad bipartisan support for the measure. However, there might be concerns regarding any unintended consequences of limiting public access to information that some may argue is essential for transparency.
Contention
One notable point of contention discussed during the deliberations revolves around the balance between public transparency and the necessity for protection of vulnerable individuals in the judicial system. While advocates praise the bill for its protective merits, critics might argue that too restrictive measures could hinder public accountability for appointed officials. Such discussions reflect ongoing tensions in policy-making regarding confidentiality versus transparency in governance.
Same As
Relating to address confidentiality on certain documents for certain federal officials and family members of certain federal officials or federal or state court judges.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for employees of a county courthouse or the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the employees' family members.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for a current or former administrative law judge for the State Office of Administrative Hearings.
Relating to address confidentiality on certain documents for certain federal officials and family members of certain federal officials or federal or state court judges.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for employees of a county courthouse or the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the employees' family members.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for employees of a county, a court, or the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the employees' family members.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for commissioners and employees whose duties relate to the administration of the judicial branch of state government and the commissioners' and employees' family members.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for a current or former administrative law judge for the State Office of Administrative Hearings.