LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 10, 2021 TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB1359 by Hughes (Relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers could be absorbed using existing resources.This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources. Local Government ImpactThe fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time. Source Agencies: b > td > 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, KFB, NA
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 10, 2021
TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB1359 by Hughes (Relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1359 by Hughes (Relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers.), As Engrossed
Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1359 by Hughes (Relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers.), As Engrossed
SB1359 by Hughes (Relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to adoption by law enforcement agencies of a mental health leave policy for peace officers could be absorbed using existing resources.This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.
Local Government Impact
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time.
Source Agencies: b > td > 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement
405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, KFB, NA
JMc, DKN, KFB, NA