Relating to health benefit plan coverage for hair prostheses for breast cancer patients.
If enacted, HB 1164 will amend Chapter 1371 of the Insurance Code, requiring specific health benefit plans to include coverage for hair prostheses up to a minimum benefit amount of $100. This change will impact various groups, including standard health benefit plans, Medicaid, and local health care programs, ensuring that many Texas residents will have access to essential coverage without facing additional premiums for this service. The bill also specifies that repair or replacement of these hair prostheses must be covered unless caused by misuse, reinforcing the support for cancer patients.
House Bill 1164, introduced by Gervin-Hawkins, seeks to mandate health benefit plans to cover hair prostheses for patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. This legislation aims to improve the quality of life for these patients by allowing them to access quality wigs, which are deemed essential for their emotional and psychological well-being during treatment. The bill defines hair prostheses similarly to traditional prosthetics, acknowledging the significant impact of hair loss due to cancer therapies.
The sentiment around HB 1164 is largely positive, as it receives widespread support from various stakeholders, including cancer advocacy groups and healthcare providers. The measure is seen as a compassionate response to the needs of breast cancer patients and is expected to garner bipartisan support, reflecting a collective effort to address the emotional toll of cancer treatment. However, the financial implications for health plans might raise concerns about potential costs to insurers and the market as a whole.
Notable points of contention may arise relating to the bill's implementation, particularly surrounding funding and the potential administrative burdens on health benefit providers. Critics may question whether these mandates could lead to increased premiums for policyholders. Additionally, while the bill is mostly embraced, some lawmakers may call for discussions regarding the overall sustainability of health care costs associated with mandated coverage, weighing the benefits against economic impacts.