Texas House Bill HJR102

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 2/6/23
• Out of House Committee: 4/14/23
• Voted on by House: 5/11/23

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to legalize wagering in this state on certain sporting events and requiring the legislature to dedicate to property tax relief at least 98 percent of the net state tax revenue generated from the wagering on sporting events.

Impact

This bill is significant as it seeks to amend the Texas Constitution, specifically Section 47 of Article III, which currently restricts lotteries and gaming enterprises in the state. By opening the door for sports wagering, HJR102 could reshape the gaming landscape in Texas, potentially impacting existing gaming operations and promoting economic opportunities related to sports betting. The move aims to mitigate the effects of illegal betting by formalizing and regulating the industry, thereby increasing state revenues and enhancing consumer protection through legislation.

Summary

HJR102 proposes a constitutional amendment that would authorize the Texas legislature to legalize wagering on certain sporting events. Additionally, it mandates that at least 98 percent of the net state tax revenue generated from such wagering be dedicated to property tax relief. The purpose of the amendment is to create a legal framework for sports betting in Texas while also providing financial benefits to taxpayers through property tax reductions. This joint resolution aligns with a broader trend in various states to legalize sports betting as a means to increase state revenue and support public services.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HJR102 exhibited a division among legislators and community members. Supporters, including various stakeholders in the sports and gaming industries, argue that legalizing sports betting will drive economic growth, create jobs, and improve state revenues while responsibly addressing community welfare through dedicated funding towards property tax relief. Conversely, opposition from groups like the Southern Baptist of Texas Convention reflects concerns regarding the social implications of legitimizing gambling, highlighting potential risks associated with increased vice behavior and its impact on families across the state.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding HJR102 is the argument for and against utilizing gaming as a means for state revenue generation. While proponents articulate that sports betting could be a legitimate source of funding for public goods like education and infrastructure, opponents express that relying on such revenue streams may exacerbate social issues related to gambling. The requirement for dedicating a large majority of the tax revenue to property tax relief also raises questions about how effectively this funding can address the complexities of property taxation and the varying needs of different communities across Texas.