Proposing a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to a clean and healthy environment.
Impact
The amendment, if enacted, would significantly impact state laws by embedding environmental rights into the Texas Constitution. This change would necessitate state and local government compliance in protecting these rights, potentially influencing how environmental regulations are developed and enforced across Texas. It places a responsibility on legislative, judicial, and executive branches, compelling them to conserve natural resources and maintain public access to a healthy environment. Furthermore, the bill's self-executing nature implies that it would immediately grant residents the ability to hold the government accountable regarding environmental health and natural resource preservation.
Summary
HJR119 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to a clean and healthy environment in Texas. Specifically, it aims to establish environmental rights for the public, affirming that individuals collectively hold the right to clean air, clean water, healthy soil, and the preservation of natural resources. The resolution seeks to ensure that the state acknowledges and protects these rights equitably for all residents, including future generations. If passed, this constitutional amendment would be voted on by the public in an election scheduled for November 7, 2023.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR119 appears to be generally positive among proponents who view it as a crucial step towards environmental justice and the protection of public health. Supporters argue that it recognizes the intrinsic link between a healthy environment and community well-being, advocating for legislative measures that prioritize sustainability and ecological integrity. However, the bill may face skepticism from those concerned about potential implications for economic activity and the feasibility of enforcing such rights, highlighting a balance between environmental protections and economic considerations.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise around the practical implications of enforcing this amendment. Critics could argue that establishing constitutional rights related to the environment might result in legal challenges and complications in the permitting processes for businesses and infrastructure projects. Additionally, there may be concerns about the amendment leading to increased regulatory burdens on state and local agencies tasked with enforcing environmental standards. The discussions will likely focus on how these rights can coexist with economic development while ensuring that the voice of the public concerning environmental concerns is effectively represented.
Encouraging Future Legislatures To Pass A Proposed Constitutional Amendment, And The Electorate To Ratify The Proposed Amendment, Guaranteeing All Individuals The Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment And A Stable Climate.
Encouraging Future Legislatures To Pass A Proposed Constitutional Amendment, And The Electorate To Ratify The Proposed Amendment, Guaranteeing All Individuals The Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment And A Stable Climate.
Encouraging The State Of Hawaii To Adopt A Proposed Constitutional Amendment, And The Electorate To Ratify The Proposed Amendment, Guaranteeing All Individuals The Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment And A Stable Climate.
Encouraging The State Of Hawaii To Adopt A Proposed Constitutional Amendment, And The Electorate To Ratify The Proposed Amendment, Guaranteeing All Individuals The Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment And A Stable Climate.