Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to conduct gaming by executing a gaming compact with this state; providing for occupational licensing under the compact; limiting certain taxes and fees.
The potential impact of HJR84 on state laws includes a significant shift in the regulation of gaming in Texas, particularly concerning tribal gaming. The amendment would introduce a framework for the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe to engage more directly in gaming operations on their lands, which could set a precedent for other tribes seeking similar agreements. The compact stipulates that if the state opens the door to more gaming options after January 2024, the tribe will be entitled to offer equivalent games within a proximity defined in the compact. This can lead to increased economic opportunities for the tribe and diversification of gaming options available to residents and visitors in Texas.
HJR84 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at facilitating the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to conduct gaming operations through a gaming compact with the State of Texas. This resolution seeks to amend Section 47(a) of Article III of the Texas Constitution, which traditionally prohibits lotteries and other forms of gambling, allowing for specific exceptions. By adding a new section, it empowers the tribe to execute gaming compacts that include regulated gaming activities that align with federal laws governing Indian gaming. The compacts would detail the terms under which the tribe can operate gaming activities and outline the responsibilities of both the state and the tribe in this context.
The sentiment surrounding HJR84 appears to be cautiously optimistic among tribal supporters who see it as a step towards economic empowerment and acknowledgment of tribal sovereignty in gaming matters. However, there may be concerns from segments of the public and lawmakers who oppose expanding gambling in the state, citing potential social and economic repercussions. This division reflects a broader debate about gambling regulations and local governance versus the rights of tribal nations to operate their businesses independently under federal law.
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR84 could include discussions on the impact of increased gaming on local communities, the potential for gambling addiction, and how revenues from tribal gaming will be regulated and taxed compared to non-tribal gaming establishments. Critics may argue that allowing more forms of gaming could lead to issues like increased crime or infrastructural strain, while supporters emphasize the economic benefits and tribal rights upheld by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The relationship between state authority and tribal rights in gaming could also become a focal point of contention as the compact is developed and negotiated.
Civil Practice And Remedies Code