Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB18

Filed
3/10/23  
Out of Senate Committee
4/6/23  
Voted on by Senate
4/20/23  
Out of House Committee
5/20/23  
Voted on by House
5/23/23  
Governor Action
6/17/23  

Caption

Relating to the tenure and employment of faculty members at certain public institutions of higher education.

Impact

The enactment of SB 18 would have a significant impact on the legal landscape surrounding tenure in Texas. By establishing new policies related to tenure assessment and dismissal, the bill aims to ensure that only qualified faculty remain in tenured positions while maintaining transparency in the evaluation processes. Schools will be compelled to adopt these new frameworks, leading to potential changes in existing tenure agreements and evaluations. Instituting procedures for the summary dismissal of tenured faculty for serious misconduct further shifts the dynamics of academic job security, which could affect retention rates and hiring practices across public institutions.

Summary

Senate Bill 18, also known as the Tenure Reform Bill, aims to modify the tenure and employment status of faculty members at public institutions of higher education in Texas. The bill introduces a framework detailing how tenure is granted, outlines processes for performance evaluations, and establishes conditions under which tenured faculty can be dismissed. Its proponents argue that these measures create necessary accountability and improve operational integrity in higher education institutions. With the growing concern about the effectiveness of tenure systems, supporters believe this bill is a forward-looking reform that addresses long-standing issues in higher education administration.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 18 is polarized, with vocal support and fierce opposition. Proponents, including some legislative members and associations advocating for higher education reform, view the bill as essential for accountability and improved governance in public education. Conversely, opponents, including numerous academics, faculty associations, and civil rights groups, argue that it undermines academic freedom and job security, particularly for vulnerable faculty groups. They fear this targeted approach could enable arbitrary dismissals and create a chilling effect on academic discourse and research.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the erosion of academic freedom and the implications for the quality of education in Texas. Numerous testimonies suggest that removing or curtailing tenure protections could lead to a more politically influenced academic environment and limit professors' ability to teach and research freely without fear of dismissal. Critics point out that tenure serves as a critical safeguard for independent thought and teaching excellence, arguing that SB 18 may jeopardize these foundational principles within the state's education system.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Education Code

  • Chapter 51. Provisions Generally Applicable To Higher Education
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 948
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 948
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 948
    • Section: 9745
  • Chapter 21. Educators
    • Section: 801
    • Section: 801
    • Section: 801
  • Chapter 61. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB1830

Relating to tenure and employment status at public institutions of higher education in this state.

Similar Bills

TX HB324

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Computational Health Research Institute.

TX SB1348

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Computational Health Research Institute.

CA SB354

Insurance Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2025.

NJ A4220

Revises Statewide transfer agreements for transfer of academic credit and reverse credit at participating institutions of higher education; establishes New Jersey Transfer Ombudsperson within Office of Secretary of Higher Education.

RI S0305

Establishes the right of a medical practitioner, healthcare institution, or healthcare payer not to participate in or pay for any medical procedure or service this violates their conscience.

CA SB289

Postsecondary education: Gender and Sex Discrimination Educational Oversight Office.

TX SB16

Relating to the purpose of public institutions of higher education and a prohibition on compelling students enrolled at those institutions to adopt certain beliefs.

SC H3486

Student and Administration Equality Act