Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB2194

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to promoting racial equity in the hiring and promotion of faculty members by public institutions of higher education.

Impact

The legislation aims to amend the Education Code by adding a new section specifically focused on faculty diversification plans. Each institution is required to not only create and update these plans but also submit annual reports to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board detailing their progress. The reports must include disaggregated data concerning the rank, salary, tenure, and promotion levels of faculty members of color in comparison with their white counterparts, thereby holding institutions accountable for the diversification of their faculty.

Summary

Senate Bill 2194 seeks to promote racial equity in the hiring and promotion processes of faculty members at public institutions of higher education in Texas. The bill mandates that each institution develop a five-year plan aimed at increasing racial diversity among faculty to better reflect the demographic makeup of their student bodies. This involves conducting diversity assessments, implementing strategies for recruitment, and utilizing research-based methods to support faculty members of color throughout their careers, including tenure and promotion processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2194 appears to be generally supportive among stakeholders advocating for racial equity and diversity in higher education. Proponents, such as advocacy groups and some legislative members, emphasize that the bill is a crucial step towards achieving equity and dismantling systemic barriers faced by faculty members of color. However, there could be opposing voices concerned with potential overreach or implications for hiring practices, urging that such measures might unintentionally foster discrimination against non-minority candidates.

Contention

The notable points of contention revolve around concerns regarding how equity and diversity initiatives are implemented. Some critics argue that aggressive diversity mandates could lead to tokenism or detract from merit-based hiring. Furthermore, there may be debates about the metrics used to assess success in increasing diversity, ensuring that they are not only quantitative but also qualitative in evaluating the institutional climate for faculty of color. The long-term success of the bill will depend on the commitment of public institutions to genuinely engage with and address these complexities.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Education Code

  • Chapter 51. Provisions Generally Applicable To Higher Education
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 61. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.

CA AB1341

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA SB1433

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB2341

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: out-of-state public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1160

Protecting Students from Creditor Colleges Act.