Relating to restitution payments for the support of a child whose parent or guardian is a victim of intoxication manslaughter.
If passed, Senate Bill 703 would impact existing laws concerning restitution within the criminal justice framework, particularly in cases of intoxication manslaughter. The new provisions would ensure that financial responsibilities extend to the convicted individuals with regard to the well-being of minor children left without parental support due to the crime. The bill reflects a shift towards recognizing and addressing the collateral consequences of intoxication-related offenses, specifically how such acts impact minors.
Senate Bill 703, introduced by Senator Paxton, aims to address restitution payments specifically aimed at supporting children whose parent or guardian is a victim of intoxication manslaughter. The bill mandates that a court shall order defendants convicted of intoxication manslaughter to pay a defined monthly amount for the support of the affected child until they reach 18 years of age or graduate from high school. The bill emphasizes that the amount to be paid will consider various factors, including the financial resources of the child, surviving parent, and educational needs.
The general sentiment about SB 703 appears to be supportive within legislative discussions. Supporters describe it as a fiscally responsible initiative aimed at safeguarding the future of children affected by violent crimes, highlighting its potential effectiveness as indicated in previous legislative discussions. However, the bill's specificity might raise questions regarding implementation and the ability of the courts to determine reasonable support based on the many varying circumstances surrounding each case.
One point of contention amongst stakeholders could be how the bill delineates the scope of financial responsibilities imposed on defendants, particularly in regards to determining what constitutes a 'reasonable and necessary' financial support amount. Additionally, concerns may arise related to defendants' ability to meet these obligations especially if they are imprisoned, raising issues of fairness and their capacity to contribute financially from behind bars. As provisions state that defendants must pay all arrearages, the potential for burdening those unable to pay may spark further debate.
Code Of Criminal Procedure