Relating to state agency terminology used in describing the landlocked territory on the western bank of the Jordan River.
Impact
If enacted, HB154 would amend the Government Code to redefine how state agencies communicate about these territories. By restricting the terminology to Judea and Samaria, the bill aims to bolster support for the legitimacy of Israeli claims over these areas. This change would require a substantial shift in existing practices and could affect how Texas officials represent their stance on Middle Eastern geopolitics in official documentation and communications.
Summary
House Bill 154 aims to change the terminology used by state agencies in Texas when referring to a specific geographical area historically known as Judea and Samaria, which is part of the land previously controlled by Jordan until the 1967 Six-Day War. The bill proposes that state agencies may only refer to this area using its historical names and prohibits the use of the term 'West Bank' in any official agency statements. This shift reflects a legislative intent to alter perceptions and official language regarding the territorial claims in this region.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB154 is likely to be polarizing. Supporters might argue that this bill aligns Texas with pro-Israel sentiments and promotes a positive historical narrative, while critics may contend that it simplifies a complex geopolitical issue into a framework that disregards Palestinians' perspectives and rights. The bill is part of a broader trend in some states to adopt laws that reflect a specific ideological stance on Israel.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding this bill center on the implications of institutionalizing specific terminology. Critics could argue that enforcing such language in government statements may lead to further politicization of governmental functions and disproportionately impact academic and diplomatic discourse. Additionally, the limitations imposed on state agencies may raise concerns about free speech and the accuracy of information conveyed by state officials, potentially leading to legal and ethical challenges.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to the partially landlocked body of water on the southeastern periphery of the North American continent.
Relating to the terminology used in statute, resolutions, rules, and other state publications to refer to the partially landlocked body of water on the southeastern periphery of the North American continent.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.
Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the terminology used in the Texas Constitution to refer to the partially landlocked body of water on the southeastern periphery of the North American continent.
Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the terminology used in the Texas Constitution to refer to the partially landlocked body of water on the southeastern periphery of the North American continent.