Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2697

Filed
2/12/25  
Out of House Committee
4/29/25  
Voted on by House
5/8/25  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/25  
Voted on by Senate
5/23/25  
Governor Action
6/20/25  

Caption

Relating to certain procedures in connection with a bond forfeiture.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2697 would clarify and codify procedures in bond forfeiture, potentially leading to more streamlined legal processes. This change could minimize disputes arising from miscommunication and ensure that all parties, including defendants accused of felonies, receive appropriate legal representation. The complexity around bond forfeiture might be reduced, thus assisting courts in managing these cases more efficiently.

Summary

House Bill 2697 aims to amend procedures related to bond forfeiture within Texas' criminal law. The bill introduces changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure by outlining the process a surety must follow to surrender a principal. Specifically, it requires a surety to notify both the principal's attorney and the state's attorney in felony cases before filing an affidavit of surrender. This provides a legal framework that enhances communication during bond forfeiture proceedings and ensures all parties involved are properly informed.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 2697 appears to be supportive, particularly among legal professionals who recognize the need for improved procedural clarity in bond forfeiture cases. Advocates argue that by requiring additional notifications, the bill fosters a fairer legal process for defendants and ensures transparency between attorneys involved. However, some skepticism exists regarding the implications of added requirements on sureties, who may find the new obligations burdensome.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between thorough legal procedures and the administrative burden placed on sureties. Some stakeholders may contend that increasing the notification requirements will complicate the bond forfeiture process, potentially deterring sureties from engaging in these agreements. Conversely, proponents maintain that the amendments will safeguard defendants' rights by ensuring they are adequately represented, especially in serious felony cases.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Code Of Criminal Procedure

  • Chapter 17. Bail
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19
    • Section: 19

Companion Bills

TX SB2219

Identical Relating to certain procedures in connection with a bond forfeiture.

Previously Filed As

TX HB3758

Relating to repealing civil asset forfeiture provisions and establishing criminal asset forfeiture in this state.

TX HB5088

Relating to procedures regarding certain persons who are or may be persons with a mental illness or intellectual disability.

TX SB2479

Relating to procedures regarding certain persons who are or may be persons with a mental illness or intellectual disability.

TX HB4504

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, including conforming amendments.

TX HB2992

Relating to asset forfeiture under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

TX SB952

Relating to certain tax and fee collection procedures and taxpayer suits.

TX SB1457

Relating to guardianships and the delivery of certain notices or other communications in connection with guardianship proceedings.

TX SB1401

Relating to the rights of victims of sexual assault and to certain procedures and reimbursements occurring with respect to a sexual assault or other sex offense.

TX HB828

Relating to the age of criminal responsibility and to certain substantive and procedural matters related to that age.

TX SB648

Relating to the procedure for removing certain prosecuting attorneys for their policies on the enforcement of criminal offenses; providing a private cause of action.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.