Relating to a severance tax exemption for oil and gas produced from certain previously inactive restimulation wells; providing a civil penalty.
If enacted, HB 3159 would modify the Texas Tax Code by adding a new section that outlines specific procedures and criteria for oil and gas operators to apply for tax exemptions. It establishes qualifications for an operator to seek certification from the Railroad Commission of Texas (the Commission) that their well is a qualifying restimulation well. The bill emphasizes accountability, with civil penalties for false applications to prevent misuse of the exemption provisions. Overall, this legislation is designed to support the oil and gas industry, particularly in revitalizing productions that have previously stalled.
House Bill 3159 introduces a severance tax exemption for oil and gas extracted from certain previously inactive restimulation wells. The bill's provisions specify that hydrocarbons produced from qualifying wells, which have undergone restimulation treatments, will be exempt from applicable severance taxes for a specified period. The exemption will last until either the last day of the 36th month following successful restimulation or until the cumulative exempted taxes reach $750,000, whichever comes first. This approach aims to incentivize the revival of inactive wells and boost energy production within the state.
The discussions surrounding HB 3159 suggest a generally positive sentiment towards its potential impact on the energy sector. Proponents argue it would encourage investment in underperforming wells and increase production levels, thereby contributing to the state’s energy needs. However, as with many industry-focused bills, concerns about potential oversight and enforcement of exemption criteria have been raised, particularly regarding the accurate reporting of restimulation costs and production outcomes.
Some contention exists around ensuring that the implementation of HB 3159 does not come at the expense of fiscal responsibility for the state. Critics may argue that the focus on providing tax breaks could reduce revenue that might be beneficial for state budget allocations. Additionally, ensuring that only eligible wells qualify for the tax exemptions remains an important consideration, prompting questions about the administrative burden on both the Commission and operators. These considerations illustrate the need for balanced approaches in enabling industry growth while maintaining regulatory oversight.
Tax Code
Natural Resources Code