Relating to certain procedures in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship for a child placed in the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services and the provision of family preservation services and community-based foster care.
The passage of SB1398 would result in significant changes to state law, particularly in the administration of child welfare and foster care services. By establishing expectations for community-based care and requiring contractors to focus on family preservation and reunification efforts, the bill emphasizes the importance of keeping families intact whenever safely possible. The bill's mandate for performance monitoring and oversight of contracted services embodies a proactive approach to ensuring that the needs of children and families are adequately met, aiming for a reduction in foster care placements and homelessness for the youth in the system.
SB1398 aims to revise the procedural framework for cases involving children placed under the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) while enhancing family preservation services. The bill facilitates a more structured approach to the management of cases affecting the parent-child relationship by introducing specific definitions for family preservation services, which include efforts to keep children safely with their families. This approach aligns with current federal guidelines under the Family First Prevention Services Act, ensuring that Texas's state provisions are consistent with federal expectations for child welfare reforms.
The sentiment surrounding SB1398 varies significantly among stakeholders. Advocates for child welfare, including families and non-profits focused on family services, generally view the bill positively, seeing it as a necessary step toward more supportive measures for at-risk families. However, some concerns have been raised about the practical implementation of community-based services, especially regarding adequate funding and resources to ensure their success. Discussions have highlighted fears that without proper oversight and accountability, the intentions behind the bill may not translate into measurable improvements on the ground.
Notable points of contention include the execution of family preservation services and the criteria for determining the appropriateness of placements. Critics argue that without sufficient resources and an adequately trained workforce, the goals of SB1398 may be undermined, potentially placing vulnerable children at risk. The bill's provisions concerning contractor performance evaluations and compliance with court orders indicate a shift towards greater accountability, yet there are apprehensions from some communities regarding the impact on local control and the potential for bureaucratic challenges in implementing these changes.
Family Code
Human Resources Code