Relating to a public hearing requirement for a proposal by the governor or the Legislative Budget Board to affect appropriations and certain actions of the governor during a state of disaster.
If passed, SB950 is expected to reshape emergency management protocols by instituting clearer checks on executive authority during disasters. This legislation aims to reinforce the role of the Legislative Budget Board in evaluating proposed actions and appropriations, serving as a counterbalance to potential unilateral executive decisions. It ensures that any executive orders or proclamations issued in such emergencies reflect collective legislative input rather than emanating solely from the governor's discretion.
SB950 introduces a public hearing requirement for proposals made by the governor or the Legislative Budget Board that would affect appropriations and certain actions of the governor during a state of disaster. The bill seeks to amend current provisions in the Government Code to ensure greater oversight and transparency regarding the powers exercised by the governor in times of disaster. Specifically, the bill mandates that public hearings be held after proposals are published, allowing for broader legislative scrutiny and public input before any actions are taken.
The key points of contention surrounding SB950 include the balance of power between legislative and executive branches during declared disasters. Proponents argue that the bill enhances democratic principles by allowing public participation in critical decision-making processes that affect state resources and administration. Conversely, some skeptics could view this move as a hindrance to prompt and decisive actions needed during emergencies, potentially complicating the state's ability to respond swiftly to disasters. The discourse surrounding the bill indicates a broader discussion about governance, transparency, and the limitations of executive emergency powers.